Grachev Vladimir Innokentievich,
Doctor of Cultural Studies, Professor
Leningrad StatePushkinUniversity
e-mail: vig1947@mail.ru

Communication-the connecting substance of culture

Abstract. This article continues the abridged summary of the basic chapters of the new monograph "Substances and Paradigms of Modern Culture", which is being prepared for publication. It presents the author's concept of communication as a connecting substantive basis of the information-rhizomatic field structure of modern culture.

Keywords: culture, substance, paradigm, entropy, information, field structures, rhizome, communication, space, time, topochron.

[1] Sepir E. Selected works on linguistics and cultural studies; Trans. from English. Moscow: Progress-Univer, 1993 656 p.
[2] Jess Hawk Shira. Introduction to library Science. Trans. from English. Moscow: Higher School, 1983. 256 p.
[3] Bely A. Symbolism as a worldview. Moscow: Republic.1994. 528 p.
[4] Luman N. What is communication? // Sotsiologicheskiyzhurnal. 1995.No. 3 Pp. 114-124; Luhman N. Improbability of communication. // Problems of theoretical sociology. 2000.Issue.3. St. Petersburg State University. Pp. 42-53.
[5] Maturana U., Varela F. The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding / Translated from English by Yu. A. Danilova. Moscow: Progress-Tradition, 2001. 224 p.
[6] Vasilkova V. V. Order and chaos in the development of social systems: Synergetics and the theory of social self-organization. St. Petersburg: Lan, 1999. 479 p.
[7] Maturana U., Varela F. Decree op.
[8] Luman N. Edict. Op.
[9] Ibid.
[10] Aristotle. Works: In 4 volumes (Series "Philosophical heritage"). Moscow: Mysl, 1975-1983.
[11] Luhmann N. Decree. Op.
[12] Ibid.
[13] Ibid.
[14] Ibid.
[15] Ibid.
[16] Lotman Yu. M. About art. St. Petersburg: Iskusstvo, 2005. 704 p.
[17] Flier A. Ya. The structure of culture. Culture as a subject of scientific knowledge // Kulturakultury. 2017. No. 2.
[18] Grachev V. I. Communications-Values-Culture (experience of information-axiological analysis. Monograph. St. Petersburg: Asterion, 2006. 240 p.
[19] White L. The theory of evolution in cultural anthropology // White L. Favorites: The evolution of culture. Moscow: ROSSPAN, 2004.586 p.
[20] Lich E. Culture and Communication: The logic of the relationship of symbols. On the use of structural analysis in social anthropology, Moscow: 2001. 142 p.
[21] Hawking S. The future of space-time. St. Petersburg: Amphora, 2009. 256 p.
[22] Einstein A. Physics and Reality. Moscow: Nauka, 1965.
[23] Dewey J. Experience and nature. Moscow, 1997.
[24] Deleuze J., Guattari F. Rhizome. Vvedenie. Moscow, 1976.
[25] Grachev V. I. Informatsionno-rizomofnaya osnova kommunikativnoy paradigmy sovremennoy kultury 4 // Kulturakultury. 2020. No. 1.
[26] Lotman Yu. M. Culture and explosion. M.: Gnosis, 1992. 246 p.
[27] Sokolov E. V. Kulturology. Essays on the Theory of culture, Moscow: 1992. 227 p.
[28] Sokolov A.V. The phenomenon of socio-cultural activity. St. Petersburg: SPbGUP, 2003. 204 p.
[29] See for example: Vandries J., Leach E., Lotman Y., Sepir E., Stepin V., Eco U., etc.
[30] Stepin V. S. Civilization and culture. St. Petersburg: SPbGUP, 2011. 407 p.
[31] Grachev V. I. Communications-Values-Culture (experience of information-axiological analysis.
[32] Ibid.
[33] Kagan M. S. The world of communication: The problem of intersubjective relations. Moscow: Politizdat, 1988. 319 p.
[34] Lotman Yu. M. Culture and explosion.