Электронный журнал «Культура культуры»

SCIENTIFIC AND EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY FOR CULTURAL STUDIES
SCIENTIFIC ASSOCIATION OF CULTURE RESEARCHERS

Scientific peer-reviewed electronic periodical
Since 2014

Hypotheses:

THE THEORY OF CULTURE

E.A. Orlova. The anthropological foundations of scientific knowledge

Discussions:

IN SEARCH OF THE MEANING OF HISTORY AND CULTURE (A.Ya. Flier's section)

A.V. Kostin, A.Ya. Flier. Ternary functional model of culture (continued)

N.A. Khrenov. Russian culture at the turn of the XIX–XX centuries: the Gnostic "Renaissance" in the context of symbolism (continued)

V.M. Rozin. Some features of modern art

V.I. Ionesov. Memory of things in images and plots of cultural introspection

Analytics:

CULTURAL REFLECTIONS

A.Ya. Flier. Social and organizational functions of culture

M.I. Kozyakova. The Ancient cosmos and its evolution: ritual, spectacle, entertainment

N.A. Malshina. The post-non-classical paradigm in the study of the Russian cultural industry: A new type of rationality and value system

N.A. Khrenov. A Century later: the tragic experience of Soviet Culture (continued)

Announcement of the next issue

Khrenov Nikolai Andreevich,
Doctor of Philosophy, Professor,
the Gerasimov Russian State
University of Cinematography
e-mail: nihrenov@mail.ru

Between America and China: the Concept of the “Other”
in the formation and transformation of the civilizational identity of Russia
(ending)

Abstract. The article attempts to comprehend the internal and external factors of civilizational identity, in this case, in its Russian version. The article focuses on external factors, which should be understood as the concept of "Other", i.e. another civilization. In this case, the Other means both American civilization and China as a civilization. The author insists that at the turn of the XX and XXI centuries, three independent civilizations-Russia, America and China demonstrate intensive forms of interaction, which affects the transformation of Russia's civilizational identity. This is manifested both in the desire to resist American hegemony, and in the turn from the West towards China, which makes the idea of the Eurasians that arose in the first decades of the last century relevant. The article takes into account the discrepancy in the time phases of the functioning of these civilizations. If America finally acquires civilizational forms and continues to experience passionate tension in the twentieth century, then, for example, China is one of the oldest civilizations. Russia deserves a special conversation, which has repeatedly radically revised its civilizational identity in its history. Today, in its history, it is experiencing another radical turn, focusing more on the East. The author's idea is usually illustrated with the help of the experience of cinema.

Keywords. Civilization, civilizational identity, Russia, America, China, the West, Byzantium, medieval Russia, empire, Other, internal factor, external factor, psychological factor of identity, personality type, basic personality, fracture of civilization, passionary, passionary tension, V. Solovyov, N. Danilevsky, A. Khomyakov, Slavophiles, Spengler, Toynbee, Eurasianism, stoicism, phases of civilization, pan-mongolism

[98] Ortega y Gasset H. Decree. op. p. 125.
[99] Ibid., p. 126.
[100] Grigorieva T. Tao and Logos (Meeting of cultures). M., 1992. p. 8.
[101] Toroptsev S. "International brand" of Chinese cinema: director Ch. Yimou. M.: Economics, 2008. P. 168.
[102] Antonioni about Antonioni. P. 180.
[103] M. Gran Chinese thought. M.: Respublika, 2004. S. 391.
[104] S. Toroptsev Decree. CIT. p. 170.
[105] A. Khomyakov Essays. Vol. 4. M., 1909. P. 33.
[106] Khrenov N. Complex of Imperial Russia and its critics: A. I. Solzhenitsyn // Personality and works of A. I. Solzhenitsyn in contemporary art and literature. Moscow: the Russian way, 2018. S. 156.
[107] Solovyev V. national question in Russia // Solov'ev V. Works: in 2 t. T. 1. Moscow: Publishing House "Pravda", 1989. P. 418.
[108] Khrenov N. Russian Proteus. SPb.: Aletheia, 2007.
[109] G. Fedotov Letters about Russian culture // Fedotov G. the Fate and the sins of Russia. Selected articles on the philosophy of Russian history and culture: in 2 vols. Vol. 1. St. Petersburg: Sofia, 1991. p. 173.
[110] Ibid. p. 177.
[111] Neumann I. Decree. op. p. 230.
[112] Polybius. Universal History: in 40 books. Vol. 1. M., 1890. p. 14.
[113] Ibid. p. 14.
[114] Neumann I. Decree. op. p. 128.
[115] Andreev D. The Rose of the World. Metaphilosophy of History. M., 1991. p. 158.
[116] Florovsky G. Ways of Russian Theology. Kiev, 1991. p. 500.
[117] Merezhkovsky D. L. Tolstoy and Dostoevsky. Eternal companions. M.: Republic, 1995. p. 68.
[118] Merezhkovsky D. Decree. op. p. 68.
[119] Trubetskoy N. A look at Russian history not from the West, but from the East // Trubetskoy N. The Legacy of Genghis Khan. M., 2007. p. 357.
[120] N. Trubetskoy. Decree. CIT. p. 298.
[121] Berdyaev N. The problem of East and West in the religious consciousness of V. Solovyov. S. 125.
[122] Berdyaev N. Decree. CIT. p. 125.
[123] Firsov N. Rutinoside as a sociological and psychological phenomenon of people's life. Pg., 1914.
[124] Red Star. 29.09.1961.

ISSN 2311-3723

Founder:
OOO «Soglasie» publisher

Publisher:
Scientific Association of Culture Researchers

Official registration № ЭЛ № ФС 77 – 56414 от 11.12.2013

The magazine is indexed:

Issued quarterly in electronic form only

Issue produced by:

Editorial Director
A. Flier

Editor in Chief
T. Glazkova

Head of IT Center
A. Lukyanov

Our banner:

Our e-mail:
cultschool@gmail.com

OUR PARTNERS:

SCIENTIFIC AND EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY FOR CULTURAL STUDIES SCIENTIFIC ASSOCIATION OF CULTURE RESEARCHERS Scientific peer-reviewed electronic periodical Since 2014
	NEW ISSUE ABOUT EDITORS TO AUTORS ARCHIVE	РУС ENG

Hypotheses: THE THEORY OF CULTURE E.A. Orlova. The anthropological foundations of scientific knowledge Discussions: IN SEARCH OF THE MEANING OF HISTORY AND CULTURE (A.Ya. Flier's section) A.V. Kostin, A.Ya. Flier. Ternary functional model of culture (continued) N.A. Khrenov. Russian culture at the turn of the XIX–XX centuries: the Gnostic "Renaissance" in the context of symbolism (continued) V.M. Rozin. Some features of modern art V.I. Ionesov. Memory of things in images and plots of cultural introspection Analytics: CULTURAL REFLECTIONS A.Ya. Flier. Social and organizational functions of culture M.I. Kozyakova. The Ancient cosmos and its evolution: ritual, spectacle, entertainment N.A. Malshina. The post-non-classical paradigm in the study of the Russian cultural industry: A new type of rationality and value system N.A. Khrenov. A Century later: the tragic experience of Soviet Culture (continued) Announcement of the next issue	Khrenov Nikolai Andreevich, Doctor of Philosophy, Professor, the Gerasimov Russian State University of Cinematography e-mail: nihrenov@mail.ru Between America and China: the Concept of the “Other” in the formation and transformation of the civilizational identity of Russia (ending) Abstract. The article attempts to comprehend the internal and external factors of civilizational identity, in this case, in its Russian version. The article focuses on external factors, which should be understood as the concept of "Other", i.e. another civilization. In this case, the Other means both American civilization and China as a civilization. The author insists that at the turn of the XX and XXI centuries, three independent civilizations-Russia, America and China demonstrate intensive forms of interaction, which affects the transformation of Russia's civilizational identity. This is manifested both in the desire to resist American hegemony, and in the turn from the West towards China, which makes the idea of the Eurasians that arose in the first decades of the last century relevant. The article takes into account the discrepancy in the time phases of the functioning of these civilizations. If America finally acquires civilizational forms and continues to experience passionate tension in the twentieth century, then, for example, China is one of the oldest civilizations. Russia deserves a special conversation, which has repeatedly radically revised its civilizational identity in its history. Today, in its history, it is experiencing another radical turn, focusing more on the East. The author's idea is usually illustrated with the help of the experience of cinema. Keywords. Civilization, civilizational identity, Russia, America, China, the West, Byzantium, medieval Russia, empire, Other, internal factor, external factor, psychological factor of identity, personality type, basic personality, fracture of civilization, passionary, passionary tension, V. Solovyov, N. Danilevsky, A. Khomyakov, Slavophiles, Spengler, Toynbee, Eurasianism, stoicism, phases of civilization, pan-mongolism [98] Ortega y Gasset H. Decree. op. p. 125. [99] Ibid., p. 126. [100] Grigorieva T. Tao and Logos (Meeting of cultures). M., 1992. p. 8. [101] Toroptsev S. "International brand" of Chinese cinema: director Ch. Yimou. M.: Economics, 2008. P. 168. [102] Antonioni about Antonioni. P. 180. [103] M. Gran Chinese thought. M.: Respublika, 2004. S. 391. [104] S. Toroptsev Decree. CIT. p. 170. [105] A. Khomyakov Essays. Vol. 4. M., 1909. P. 33. [106] Khrenov N. Complex of Imperial Russia and its critics: A. I. Solzhenitsyn // Personality and works of A. I. Solzhenitsyn in contemporary art and literature. Moscow: the Russian way, 2018. S. 156. [107] Solovyev V. national question in Russia // Solov'ev V. Works: in 2 t. T. 1. Moscow: Publishing House "Pravda", 1989. P. 418. [108] Khrenov N. Russian Proteus. SPb.: Aletheia, 2007. [109] G. Fedotov Letters about Russian culture // Fedotov G. the Fate and the sins of Russia. Selected articles on the philosophy of Russian history and culture: in 2 vols. Vol. 1. St. Petersburg: Sofia, 1991. p. 173. [110] Ibid. p. 177. [111] Neumann I. Decree. op. p. 230. [112] Polybius. Universal History: in 40 books. Vol. 1. M., 1890. p. 14. [113] Ibid. p. 14. [114] Neumann I. Decree. op. p. 128. [115] Andreev D. The Rose of the World. Metaphilosophy of History. M., 1991. p. 158. [116] Florovsky G. Ways of Russian Theology. Kiev, 1991. p. 500. [117] Merezhkovsky D. L. Tolstoy and Dostoevsky. Eternal companions. M.: Republic, 1995. p. 68. [118] Merezhkovsky D. Decree. op. p. 68. [119] Trubetskoy N. A look at Russian history not from the West, but from the East // Trubetskoy N. The Legacy of Genghis Khan. M., 2007. p. 357. [120] N. Trubetskoy. Decree. CIT. p. 298. [121] Berdyaev N. The problem of East and West in the religious consciousness of V. Solovyov. S. 125. [122] Berdyaev N. Decree. CIT. p. 125. [123] Firsov N. Rutinoside as a sociological and psychological phenomenon of people's life. Pg., 1914. [124] Red Star. 29.09.1961.	ISSN 2311-3723 Founder: OOO «Soglasie» publisher Publisher: Scientific Association of Culture Researchers Official registration № ЭЛ № ФС 77 – 56414 от 11.12.2013 The magazine is indexed: Issued quarterly in electronic form only *Issue produced by:* Editorial Director A. Flier Editor in Chief T. Glazkova Head of IT Center A. Lukyanov Our banner: Our e-mail: cultschool@gmail.com OUR PARTNERS:

	NEW ISSUE ABOUT EDITORS TO AUTORS ARCHIVE	РУС ENG
Разработка сайта Мнение редакции может не совпадать с мнением авторов. При полном или частичном использовании материалов ссылка на «Культуру культуры» обязательна. © Научная ассоциация исследователей культуры, 2014-2024