SCIENTIFIC AND EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY FOR CULTURAL STUDIES
SCIENTIFIC ASSOCIATION OF CULTURE RESEARCHERS

Culture of culture

Scientific peer-reviewed electronic periodical
Since 2014

РУС ENG

Hypotheses:

THEORY OF CULTURE

A. Ya. Flier. Paradigms and Schools of the Theory of culture of modern Russian cultural studies

 

Discussions:

IN THE SEARCH FOR THE MEANING OF HISTORY AND CULTURE (A. Ya. Flier’s Section)

N. A. Khrenov. Between America and China: the Concept of the “Other” in the Formation and Transformation of the Civilizational Identity of Russia (continued)

V. M. Rozin. The Mission of Russia and its Relations to Europe in the Diaries of the Writer by F. M. Dostoevsky

T. V. Glazkova. The main concepts of Russian culture in the education system

 

Analytics:

HIGH ART IN THE CULTURE OF MODERNITY (E. N. Shapinskaya’s Sectoin)

E. N. Shapinskaya. Spaces of consumerism in popular culture: shopping center in an urban environment

CULTURAL REFLECTIONS

N. A. Khrenov. How to think of going beyond the boundaries of culture: Systemic and non-systemic levels of cultural functioning (beginning)

M. I. Kozyakova. Cultural Studies – yesterday, today, tomorrow

V. I. Grachev. The phenomenology of sociocultural communication as a special Substance of Culture

REPUBLIKATSIYA

A. Ya. Flier. Woman as a cultural text


Announcement of the next issue

 

 

Shapinskaya Ekaterina Nikolaevna,
Doctor of Philosophy, Professor,
Russian State University of Physical Education,
Sport, Youth and Tourism.
e-mail: reenash@mail.ru

Image, Reality and Reinterpretation: an Analysis of Literary and Screen Texts

Abstract. The article touches upon a relationship between reality and different forms of its representation in cultural texts. The author focuses on representation, which dominates in modern media culture, its being the environment for mastering reality in (post)modern culture. Representation analysis of various sociocultural phenomena, related to literary and screen texts of (post)modern culture, shows that it is a construct far from being mimetic, built up in accordance with the representation policy dominating in a certain sociocultural situation. At the same time these representations determine the modern individual’s perception of reality, his having grown and been brought up in a totally mediatized culture.

Keywords. Representation, reality, mediatization, cultural text, screen art, literature, narrative.

 

[1] Bourdieu P. Artistic Taste and Cultural Capital // Culture and Society. Contemporary Debates. Ed. J.C. Alexander. Cambridge University Press, 1990. Р. 206.
[2] Hutcheon L. The Politics of Postmodernism. L.-NY.: Routledge, 1991. Р. 7.
[3] Ibid.
[4] Harvey D. The Condition of Postmodernity. Cambridge Ma, Oxford UK: Polity Press, 1992. Р. 30.
[5] Eagleton T. Literary Theory. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 1996. Р. 156.
[6] Ibid. Р. 158.
[7] Hutcheon L. Op. cit. P. 6.
[8] Eagleton T. Op. cit. P. 88.
[9] Ibid. Р. 89.
[10] Ibid.
[11] Graham G. Philosophy of the Arts.  L.-NY.: Routledge, 1997. Р. 7.
[12] Rudnev V.P. The Dictionary of the 20th Century Culture. М.: Аgraf, 1997.
[13] Sukovataya V.А. The Face of the Other. Corporal Images of the Other in Cultural Anthropology. Kharkov: KhNU, 2009.  P. 49.
[14] Barthes R. From Work to Text // Barthes R. Selected Works. М.: Progress, 1989. P 412-423.
[15] Sukovataya V.А. Op. cit., p. 49.
[16] New Audiovisual Technologies. М.: URSS, 2005. P. 309.
[17] Harvey D. Op. cit., p.  49.
[18] Fiske J. British Cultural Studies // Channels of Discourse. Chapelhill, 1987. Р. 268.
[19] Sukovataya V.А. Op. cit., p. 47.
[20] Eagleton T. Op. cit., p. 145.
[21] Burgin, V. The End of Art Theory: Criticism and Postmodernity. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press International, 1986. Р. 108.
[22] Khrenov.N.А. Cinema: a Rehabilitation of Archetypic Reality. М.: Аgraf, 2006.  P. 112.
[23] Ibid., p. 113.
[24] Graham G. Op. cit., p. 125.
[25] Ibid.
[26] Ibid., p. 128.
[27] Lotman Yu., Tsivyan Yu. A Dialogue with Screen. Tallin: Alexandra, 1994. P. 310.
[28] Lynch D. Catching the Big Fish. Meditation, Consciousness and Creativity. М.: Eksmo, 2009. P. 23.
[29] New Audiovisual Technologies. P. 316.
[30] Deleuze G. Cinema. М.: Ad Marginem, 2004. P. 473.
[31] Ibid., p. 374.
[32] Ibid.
[33] Ibid., p. 479.
[34] Lynch D. Op. cit., p. 25.
[35] Deleuze G. Op. cit., p. 553.
[36] Ibid., p. 465.
[37] Razlogov К.E. The Screen Art: from Cinematograph to Internet.  М.: ROSSPEN, 2010. P. 19.
[38] Ibid., p. 21.
[39] Ibid., p. 89.
[40] Ibid., p. 92.
[41] Ibid., p.. 234.
[42] Ibid.
[43] Khrenov.N.А. Op. cit., p. 426.
[44] Deleuze G. Op. cit., p. 505.
[45] Razlogov К.E. Op. cit., p. 141.
[46] Ibid., p. 148.
[47] Melvil A.Yu. The Image of Other, the Image of Enemy //50/50. The New Thinking Dictionary. М.: Progress, 1989. P. 25.
[48] Shemanov A.Yu. Self-Identification and Culture. М.: Akademitchesky Proekt, 2007. P. 74.
[49] Adorno T. Cultural Industry Reconsidered // Culture and Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990. Р. 279.

 

 

ISSN 2311-3723

Founder:
OOO «Soglasie» publisher

Publisher:
Scientific Association of Culture Researchers

Official registration № ЭЛ № ФС 77 – 56414 от 11.12.2013

The magazine is indexed:

Issued quarterly in electronic form only

 

Issue produced by:

Editorial Director
A. Flier

Editor in Chief
T. Glazkova

Head of IT Center
A. Lukyanov

 

Our banner:

Our e-mail:
cultschool@gmail.com

 

 

 

Our Facebook account:

 
 

OUR PARTNERS:

РУС ENG