Grachev Vladimir Innokentievich,
Doctor of Cultural Studies, Professor
Leningrad state
University of. A.S. Pushkin
e-mail: vig1947@mail.ru

INFORMATION-ISOMORPHIC BASIS OF THE COMMUNICATIVE PARADIGM
MODERN CULTURE 4 (ending)

Abstract. The final part of the article summarizes the preliminary results of the study of the problem of hypothetical definition of the basis of the communicative paradigm of culture from the position of the substantive-rhizomatic approach, the field structure and its information-axiological analysis. Some basic provisions of this author's scientific approach and heuristic assessments of the possibility of its use as a theoretical basis for the communicative paradigm of modern culture are formulated.

Keyword. Substance, "entelechy", energy, substrate, entropy, negentropy, information, communication, "rhizome", Culturology, philosophy, "axiological communicology", axiology value, tradition, chronotope, topochron, paradigm, field

[1] Kierkegaard S. Fear and trepidation. Moscow: Republic, 1993. 383p.
[2] Aristotle. Compositions: In 4vol. M.: Mysl', 1983.
[3] Hawking S. the Future of space-time. SPb.: Amphora, 2009. 256 p.
[4] Einstein A. Physics and reality.Moscow: Nauka, 1965.
[5] Dewey J. Experience and nature. Moscow, 1997.
[6] Ibid.
[7] Grachev V. I. Communications-Values-Culture (experience of information and axiological analysis). Monograph. SPbAsterion. 2006. 240p.
[8] Grachev V. I. Modern art culture: paradigm or discourse?! (comparative axiological analysis). Monograph. SPb.:Asterion, 2016. 274p.
[9] Grachev V. I. Communicative-axiogenic paradigm of culture in modern cultural studies (paradigm-axiological analysis). Monograph. SPb.:2017. 258 p. (in print).
[10] A. Bely. Symbolism as a worldview. Moscow: Republic, 1994. P. 22
[11] Ibid.
[12] Gordukalova G. F. From the Paleolithic in the XXI century. Transition from a word to an image of knowledge about an object // Bridge, 2000, No. 40, Pp.26-29.
[13] Lotman Yu. M. About art. SPb.: Art, 2005. 704p.
[14] Voloshin M. A. Faces of creativity. L.: Science. 663p.
[15] A. Bely. Symbolism as a worldview. Moscow: Republic, 1994. 528p.
[16] Ibid.
[17] Ibid. P. 23.
[18] Kant I. Op. in 6 vols. (Philosophical heritage). Moscow: Mysl', 1963.
[19] Aristotle. Essays: In 4 volumes (series "Philosophical heritage"). Moscow: Mysl, 1975-1983.
[20] Lotze R. Microcosm in 3 vols.
[21] Kagan M. S. the Philosophical theory of value. SPb.: Petropolis, 1997. 205 p.
[22] Nietzsche F. Essays in 2 vols. M.: Thought 1989.
[23] Lossky N. O. History of Russian philosophy Moscow, 1987
[24] Flier A. Ya. Culturology as a scientific paradigm / / Culture of culture. 2015. No. 2.
[25] Flier A. ya Structure of culture. Culture as a subject of scientific knowledge. // Culture of culture. 2017. No. 2.
[26] Hegel. Science of logic: in 3 vols. (Philosophical heritage). Moscow: Mysl', 1970-1972.
[27] Leontiev K. N. Byzantium and slavyanism. M: The Imp. About-in history and antiquities grew. atMosk. UN-te, 1876. 132 p.
[28] Deleuze, G., Guattari F. Rhizome. Introduction. Moscow, 1976.
[29] Bakhtin M. M. Esthetics of verbal creativity. Moscow: Iskusstvo, 1986. 445p.
[30] Zinoviev A. A. Katastroika. Moscow, 1990.
[31] Einstein A. Physics and reality. Moscow: Nauka, 1965.
[32] Heidegger M. Time and being. Moscow: Republic, 1993. 447p.
[33] Hawking S. the Future of space-time. SPb.: Amphora, 2009. 256 p.
[34] Weber M. Selected works. Moscow: Progress, 1990. 808p.
[35] kassirer E. Philosophy of symbolic forms in 3 vols. - SPb.: University book, 2002.
[36] LEM S. the Sum of technology, Moscow: Mir, 1968. 658p.
[37] Nietzsche F. Essays in 2 vols. M.: Thought 1989.
[38] Lotman Yu. M. Culture and explosion. SPb.: Art, 1992. 176p.
[39] Weill P. the Genius of the place. Moscow: NezavisimayaGazeta, 1989. 256 p.
[40] Kuhn T. S. the Structure of scientific revolutions. Moscow: Progress, 1970 300 p.
[41] Sokolov E. V. Cultural Studies. Essays on cultural theories. M. 1994. 272 p.
[42] Kuhn T. S. the Structure of scientific revolutions.
[43] Barantsev R. G. Synergetics in modern natural science. SPb., 2003; Flier A. Ya. Culturology as a scientific paradigm // Culture of culture. 2015, No. 2.
[44] Lotman Yu. M. Culture and explosion.
[45] Flier A. Ya. Culturology as a scientific paradigm.
[46] Sokolov E. V. Cultural Studies. Essays on cultural theories