Электронный журнал «Культура культуры» :: Knowledge and information in modern Cultural Studies

SCIENTIFIC AND EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY FOR CULTURAL STUDIES
SCIENTIFIC ASSOCIATION OF CULTURE RESEARCHERS

Scientific peer-reviewed electronic periodical
Since 2014

Hypotheses:

THE THEORY OF CULTURE

E.A. Orlova. The anthropological foundations of scientific knowledge

Discussions:

IN SEARCH OF THE MEANING OF HISTORY AND CULTURE (A.Ya. Flier's section)

A.V. Kostin, A.Ya. Flier. Ternary functional model of culture (continued)

N.A. Khrenov. Russian culture at the turn of the XIX–XX centuries: the Gnostic "Renaissance" in the context of symbolism (continued)

V.M. Rozin. Some features of modern art

V.I. Ionesov. Memory of things in images and plots of cultural introspection

Analytics:

CULTURAL REFLECTIONS

A.Ya. Flier. Social and organizational functions of culture

M.I. Kozyakova. The Ancient cosmos and its evolution: ritual, spectacle, entertainment

N.A. Malshina. The post-non-classical paradigm in the study of the Russian cultural industry: A new type of rationality and value system

N.A. Khrenov. A Century later: the tragic experience of Soviet Culture (continued)

Announcement of the next issue

Grachev Vladimir Innokentievich,
Doctor of Cultural Studies, Professor
Leningrad State
University named after A.S. Pushkin
e-mail: vig1947@mail.ru

Knowledge and information in modern Cultural Studies:
Paradoxes of similarities and differences of content

Abstract. The article analyzes the problems of epistemology of modern cultural studies. Interestingly, thoroughly researched and well-established concepts unexpectedly revealed a weak explication and without the necessary clarifications and corrections can hardly be considered as consistent scientific definitions in cultural studies.

Keywords. Knowledge, information, communication, consciousness, cognition, epistemology, memory, ontology, epistemology, cognitology, culture, multiculturalism, values, traditions.

[1] Huntington S. A clash of civilizations? // Policy. 1994. No. 1. pp. 33-48.
[2] Grachev V.I. Social consequences of interpretation of some cultural concepts in modern society //Bulletin of LSU named after A.S. Pushkin. 2016. No. 1. pp. 100-107.
[3] Descartes R. Soch.: in 2 vols. M.: Thought, 1989.
[4] Kant I. Soch.: in 6 vols. (Philosophical heritage). Moscow: Mysl, 1963.
[5] Flier A.Ya. Paradigms and schools of the theory of culture of modern Russian culturology //EZH Kultura kultury 2021. No. 3.
[6] Grachev V. And Modern art culture: paradigm or discourse?! (comparative axiological analysis). Monograph. St. Petersburg: Asterion, 2016. 284 p.
[7] See: Sokolov A.V. Philosophy of information: professional and ideological studies. stipend. St. Petersburg: SPbGUKI, 2010. 368 p.
[8] Grachev V.I. The phenomenon of socio-cultural communication in modern artistic culture (information and axiological analysis) 24 00.01 – Theory and history of culture, abstract. diss. on the job. uch. step. doct. cultural studies. MGUKI, 2008. 42 p.
[9] Flier A.Ya. Selected works on the theory of culture. M.: Consent, 2014.
[10] Peltz D., Andrews F. Scientists in Organizations: On optimal conditions for Research and Development 1973.
[11] Aristotle. Works: in 4 volumes (Series "Philosophical Heritage"). Moscow: Mysl, 1975-1983.
[12] Parmenides. Fragments. Edition of the early Greek Philosophers. Moscow: Nauka, 1989.
[13] Aristotle. Decree. soc.
[14] Kant I. Decree. op.
[15] Scheler M. Selected works. M.: Gnosis, 1994. 476 p.
[16] Interesting, deep and original: the theory of the "cognitome" of Academician K.V. Anokhin, and the theory of the "cogniton", and the theory of the "cognitron", and the theory of the total brain, but all of them are at the stage of one degree or another of the unfolding of the experiment.
[17] See in more detail Chapter 12. Cognitive-creative paradoxes of Consciousness in Culture, devoted to scientific controversy with some philosophers who deny the need for the brain and consciousness for thinking: Grachev V.I. Modern art culture: paradigm or discourse?! (comparative axiological analysis). Monograph. St. Petersburg: Asterion, 2016. pp. 241-250.
[18] Viner N. The Creator and the Robot. M.: Progress, 1966.
[19] Wiener N. Cybernetics, or Control and communication in an animal and a machine. 2nd ed. Moscow: Soviet Radio, 1968. 384 p.
[20] Wiener N. Cybernetics and society M.: IL, 1958. p. 49.
[21] Ibid.
[22] Arsky Yu.M., Gilyarevsky R.S., Turov I.S., Cherny A.I. Infosphere; Information structures, systems and processes in science and society. Lyubertsy: All-Russian Institute of Scientific and Technical Information of the Russian Academy of Sciences, VINITI PEAK, 1996. 489 p.
[23] Ursul A.D. The nature of information. Philosophical essay. M.: Politizdat, 1968. 288 p.
[24] See more about this problem: Wiener N. Cybernetics and Society M.: IL, 1958; Ursul A.D. The Nature of Information. Philosophical essay. M.: Politizdat, 1968; Arsky Yu.M., Gilyarevsky R.S., Turov I.S., Cherny A.I. Infosphere; Information structures, systems and processes in science and society, 1996; Sokolov A.V. Philosophy of information: professional and ideological studies. Manual, 2010; Grachev V. And Communications – Values – Culture (experience of information-axiological analysis), 2006; Grachev V.I. Modern art culture: paradigm or discourse?! (comparative axiological analysis), 2016.
[25] Kassirer E. Philosophy of symbolic forms: in 3 volumes.-St. Petersburg: University Book,
[26] Aristotle. Decree. op.
[27] Ibid.

ISSN 2311-3723

Founder:
OOO «Soglasie» publisher

Publisher:
Scientific Association of Culture Researchers

Official registration № ЭЛ № ФС 77 – 56414 от 11.12.2013

The magazine is indexed:

Issued quarterly in electronic form only

Issue produced by:

Editorial Director
A. Flier

Editor in Chief
T. Glazkova

Head of IT Center
A. Lukyanov

Our banner:

Our e-mail:
cultschool@gmail.com

OUR PARTNERS:

SCIENTIFIC AND EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY FOR CULTURAL STUDIES SCIENTIFIC ASSOCIATION OF CULTURE RESEARCHERS Scientific peer-reviewed electronic periodical Since 2014
	NEW ISSUE ABOUT EDITORS TO AUTORS ARCHIVE	РУС ENG

Hypotheses: THE THEORY OF CULTURE E.A. Orlova. The anthropological foundations of scientific knowledge Discussions: IN SEARCH OF THE MEANING OF HISTORY AND CULTURE (A.Ya. Flier's section) A.V. Kostin, A.Ya. Flier. Ternary functional model of culture (continued) N.A. Khrenov. Russian culture at the turn of the XIX–XX centuries: the Gnostic "Renaissance" in the context of symbolism (continued) V.M. Rozin. Some features of modern art V.I. Ionesov. Memory of things in images and plots of cultural introspection Analytics: CULTURAL REFLECTIONS A.Ya. Flier. Social and organizational functions of culture M.I. Kozyakova. The Ancient cosmos and its evolution: ritual, spectacle, entertainment N.A. Malshina. The post-non-classical paradigm in the study of the Russian cultural industry: A new type of rationality and value system N.A. Khrenov. A Century later: the tragic experience of Soviet Culture (continued) Announcement of the next issue	Grachev Vladimir Innokentievich, Doctor of Cultural Studies, Professor Leningrad State University named after A.S. Pushkin e-mail: vig1947@mail.ru Knowledge and information in modern Cultural Studies: Paradoxes of similarities and differences of content Abstract. The article analyzes the problems of epistemology of modern cultural studies. Interestingly, thoroughly researched and well-established concepts unexpectedly revealed a weak explication and without the necessary clarifications and corrections can hardly be considered as consistent scientific definitions in cultural studies. Keywords. Knowledge, information, communication, consciousness, cognition, epistemology, memory, ontology, epistemology, cognitology, culture, multiculturalism, values, traditions. [1] Huntington S. A clash of civilizations? // Policy. 1994. No. 1. pp. 33-48. [2] Grachev V.I. Social consequences of interpretation of some cultural concepts in modern society //Bulletin of LSU named after A.S. Pushkin. 2016. No. 1. pp. 100-107. [3] Descartes R. Soch.: in 2 vols. M.: Thought, 1989. [4] Kant I. Soch.: in 6 vols. (Philosophical heritage). Moscow: Mysl, 1963. [5] Flier A.Ya. Paradigms and schools of the theory of culture of modern Russian culturology //EZH Kultura kultury 2021. No. 3. [6] Grachev V. And Modern art culture: paradigm or discourse?! (comparative axiological analysis). Monograph. St. Petersburg: Asterion, 2016. 284 p. [7] See: Sokolov A.V. Philosophy of information: professional and ideological studies. stipend. St. Petersburg: SPbGUKI, 2010. 368 p. [8] Grachev V.I. The phenomenon of socio-cultural communication in modern artistic culture (information and axiological analysis) 24 00.01 – Theory and history of culture, abstract. diss. on the job. uch. step. doct. cultural studies. MGUKI, 2008. 42 p. [9] Flier A.Ya. Selected works on the theory of culture. M.: Consent, 2014. [10] Peltz D., Andrews F. Scientists in Organizations: On optimal conditions for Research and Development 1973. [11] Aristotle. Works: in 4 volumes (Series "Philosophical Heritage"). Moscow: Mysl, 1975-1983. [12] Parmenides. Fragments. Edition of the early Greek Philosophers. Moscow: Nauka, 1989. [13] Aristotle. Decree. soc. [14] Kant I. Decree. op. [15] Scheler M. Selected works. M.: Gnosis, 1994. 476 p. [16] Interesting, deep and original: the theory of the "cognitome" of Academician K.V. Anokhin, and the theory of the "cogniton", and the theory of the "cognitron", and the theory of the total brain, but all of them are at the stage of one degree or another of the unfolding of the experiment. [17] See in more detail Chapter 12. Cognitive-creative paradoxes of Consciousness in Culture, devoted to scientific controversy with some philosophers who deny the need for the brain and consciousness for thinking: Grachev V.I. Modern art culture: paradigm or discourse?! (comparative axiological analysis). Monograph. St. Petersburg: Asterion, 2016. pp. 241-250. [18] Viner N. The Creator and the Robot. M.: Progress, 1966. [19] Wiener N. Cybernetics, or Control and communication in an animal and a machine. 2nd ed. Moscow: Soviet Radio, 1968. 384 p. [20] Wiener N. Cybernetics and society M.: IL, 1958. p. 49. [21] Ibid. [22] Arsky Yu.M., Gilyarevsky R.S., Turov I.S., Cherny A.I. Infosphere; Information structures, systems and processes in science and society. Lyubertsy: All-Russian Institute of Scientific and Technical Information of the Russian Academy of Sciences, VINITI PEAK, 1996. 489 p. [23] Ursul A.D. The nature of information. Philosophical essay. M.: Politizdat, 1968. 288 p. [24] See more about this problem: Wiener N. Cybernetics and Society M.: IL, 1958; Ursul A.D. The Nature of Information. Philosophical essay. M.: Politizdat, 1968; Arsky Yu.M., Gilyarevsky R.S., Turov I.S., Cherny A.I. Infosphere; Information structures, systems and processes in science and society, 1996; Sokolov A.V. Philosophy of information: professional and ideological studies. Manual, 2010; Grachev V. And Communications – Values – Culture (experience of information-axiological analysis), 2006; Grachev V.I. Modern art culture: paradigm or discourse?! (comparative axiological analysis), 2016. [25] Kassirer E. Philosophy of symbolic forms: in 3 volumes.-St. Petersburg: University Book, [26] Aristotle. Decree. op. [27] Ibid.	ISSN 2311-3723 Founder: OOO «Soglasie» publisher Publisher: Scientific Association of Culture Researchers Official registration № ЭЛ № ФС 77 – 56414 от 11.12.2013 The magazine is indexed: Issued quarterly in electronic form only *Issue produced by:* Editorial Director A. Flier Editor in Chief T. Glazkova Head of IT Center A. Lukyanov Our banner: Our e-mail: cultschool@gmail.com OUR PARTNERS:

	NEW ISSUE ABOUT EDITORS TO AUTORS ARCHIVE	РУС ENG
Разработка сайта Мнение редакции может не совпадать с мнением авторов. При полном или частичном использовании материалов ссылка на «Культуру культуры» обязательна. © Научная ассоциация исследователей культуры, 2014-2024