SCIENTIFIC AND EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY FOR CULTURAL STUDIES
SCIENTIFIC ASSOCIATION OF CULTURE RESEARCHERS

Culture of culture

Scientific peer-reviewed electronic periodical
Since 2014

РУС ENG

Hypotheses:

THEORY OF CULTURE

A. Ya. Flier. Paradigms and Schools of the Theory of culture of modern Russian cultural studies

 

Discussions:

IN THE SEARCH FOR THE MEANING OF HISTORY AND CULTURE (A. Ya. Flier’s Section)

N. A. Khrenov. Between America and China: the Concept of the “Other” in the Formation and Transformation of the Civilizational Identity of Russia (continued)

V. M. Rozin. The Mission of Russia and its Relations to Europe in the Diaries of the Writer by F. M. Dostoevsky

T. V. Glazkova. The main concepts of Russian culture in the education system

 

Analytics:

HIGH ART IN THE CULTURE OF MODERNITY (E. N. Shapinskaya’s Sectoin)

E. N. Shapinskaya. Spaces of consumerism in popular culture: shopping center in an urban environment

CULTURAL REFLECTIONS

N. A. Khrenov. How to think of going beyond the boundaries of culture: Systemic and non-systemic levels of cultural functioning (beginning)

M. I. Kozyakova. Cultural Studies – yesterday, today, tomorrow

V. I. Grachev. The phenomenology of sociocultural communication as a special Substance of Culture

REPUBLIKATSIYA

A. Ya. Flier. Woman as a cultural text


Announcement of the next issue

 

 

Khrenov Nikolai Andreevich,
Doctor of Philosophy, Professor,
the Gerasimov Russian State
University of Cinematography
e-mail: nihrenov@mail.ru

Paradoxes of Oblivion and Revival of Ideas
in Human Science (Bakhtin and Lukacs)
(Part 2 (Ending))

Abstract. The article traces the history of aesthetic views of Mikhail Bakhtin and Georg Lukacs, the former’s ones having experienced a lack of interest followed by an explosion of scientific interest, the latter’s ones - vice versa. The author investigates reasons of such irregularity in professional attitude towards both researchers.

Keywords. Philosophy, aesthetics, literary studies, Marxism, the theory of novel, the individual and the social.
 

[30] Freudenberg O. Poetics of Plot and Genre. М.: Labirint, 1997. P. 11.
[31] Ibid. P. 12.
[32] Lukacs G. Specificity of the Aesthetic. Vol. 4. М.: Progress, 1987. P. 374.
[33] Lotman Yu.M. The Sign in the Cultural System // Lotman Yu.M. Selected Articles: 3 volumes. V. 1. Articles on Semiotics and Typology of Culture. Tallinn: Alexandra, 1992. P. 192.
[34] Derrida J. On Grammotology. М.: Ad Marginem, 2000. PС. 129.
[35] Kristeva Yu. Selected Works: The Destruction of Poetics. М.: ROSSPEN, 2004. P. 420.
[36] Eliade М. Mefisto and Androgyne. SPb.: Aleteya, 1998. P. 362.
[37] Kristeva Yu. Cit. op. P. 491.
[38] Ibid. P. 403.
[39] Khrenov N.A. The Will for the Sacred. SPb.: Aleteya, 2006.
[40] Dilthey W. Hermeneutics and the Theory of Literature // Dilthey W. Collected works: 6 volumes. Vol. 4. М.: Dom Intellektualnoy Knigi, 2001. P. 267.
[41] Bazaine J. The History of History of Art. From Vasary to Nowadays. М.: Progress, 1994. P. 129.
[42] Yakimovitch A. The Age of Staggering Creations. From the History of Art and Reflections of the 20th Century. М.: Galart, 2009.
[43] Freudenberg O. Op. cit. P. 11.
[44] Besançon A. The Forbidden Image: An Intellectual History of Iconoclasm. М.: MIK, 1999. P. 243.
[45] Merezhkovsky D.  L. Tolstoy and Dostoyevsky. Eternal Companions. М.: Respublika, 1995. P. 135.
[46] Ibid. P. 135.
[47] Ibid. P. 66.
[48] Zemlyanoy S.N. A Victorious Defeat. Georg Lukács’s Unwritten Book on Dostoyevsky // Questions of Literature. . 2009. № 1. P. 15.
[49] Lukacs G. Specificity of the Aesthetic. Vol. 4. М.: Progress, 1987. P. 372.
[50] Ibid. P. 402.
[51] Ibid.
[52] Ibid. P. 457.
[53] Ibid. P. 449.
[54] Ibid. P. 450.
[55] Ibid. P. 459.
[56] Ibid.
[57] Ibid. P. 460.
[58] Lukacs G. Specificity of the Aesthetic. Vol. 1. М.: Progress, 1985. P. 135.
[59] Ibid. P. 119.
[60] Ibid. P. 125.
[61] Ibid. P. 173.
[62] Lukacs G. The Young Hegel and the Problems of Capitalist Society. М.: Nauka, 1987.
[63] Lukacs G. Specificity of the Aesthetic. Vol. 2. М.: Progress, 1986. P. 196.
[64] Lukacs G. The Theory of Novel // Literary Critic. 1935. № 2. P. 218.
[65] Lukacs G. Specificity of the Aesthetic. Vol. 1. М.: Progress, 1985. P. 28.
[66] Ibid. P. 37.
[67] Ibid. P. 38.
[68] Shklovsky V. On the Theory of Prose. M.-L.: Ardis Publishers, 1925. P. 163.
[69] Bakhtin M. Freudism. A Formal Method in Literary Studies. Marxism and the Philosophy of Language. Articles. Labirint, 2000. P. 187.
[70] Ibid. P. 331.

 

 

ISSN 2311-3723

Founder:
OOO «Soglasie» publisher

Publisher:
Scientific Association of Culture Researchers

Official registration № ЭЛ № ФС 77 – 56414 от 11.12.2013

The magazine is indexed:

Issued quarterly in electronic form only

 

Issue produced by:

Editorial Director
A. Flier

Editor in Chief
T. Glazkova

Head of IT Center
A. Lukyanov

 

Our banner:

Our e-mail:
cultschool@gmail.com

 

 

 

Our Facebook account:

 
 

OUR PARTNERS:

РУС ENG