SCIENTIFIC AND EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY FOR CULTURAL STUDIES
SCIENTIFIC ASSOCIATION OF CULTURE RESEARCHERS

Culture of culture

Scientific peer-reviewed electronic periodical
Since 2014

РУС ENG

Hypotheses:

THEORY OF CULTURE

A.Ya. Flier. The phenomenon of prestigious consumption

 

Discussions:

IN SEARCH OF THE MEANING OF HISTORY AND CULTURE (A.Ya.Flier's Section)

A.Ya. Flier. Structuring culture according to the methods of social regulation

N.A. Khrenov. A sociological turn in science. About the art of the XIX century: I. Ten's concept as an anticipation of the cultural turn (continued)

V.M. Rozin. Non-traditional, socio-cultural interpretation of the book by Meer Shalev "Fontanella" (ending)

 

Analytics:

HIGH ART IN MODERN CULTURE (E.N. Shapinskaya'sSection)

E.N. Shapinskaya. "Storytelling" as a form of narrative in Modern Popular culture

CULTURAL REFLECTIONSBY

A.Ya. Flier. Historical transformation of culture from admiration of the past to aspiration to the future

N.A. Khrenov. A man in a pandemic situation: excursions into history (beginning)

V.M. Rozin. Love in culture and family: yesterday and today (based on the novel by Meir Shalev "Two bears Came out of the forest")

V.I. Grachev. Knowledge and information in modern Cultural Studies: Paradoxes of similarities and differences of content


Announcement of the next issue

 

 

Khrenov Nikolai Andreevich,
Doctor of Philosophy, Professor,
the Gerasimov Russian State
University of Cinematography
e-mail: nihrenov@mail.ru

Philosophy of Art in View of the Appearance of Culture Concept (Part 2)

Abstract. In Part 2 of the article the author continues discussing philosophy of art – aesthetics as creation of the culture of modernity with its linear rationally sensual perception of world outlook. At the same time he emphasizes the crisis of the culture of modernity due to its anti-anthropomorphism and the role of aesthetics in opposing it.

Key words. Art, culture, Enlightenment, modernity, philosophy of life and philosophy of art, aesthetics, art criticism, gestalt.



[36] Lukacs G. Die Eigenart des Aesthetischen (Distinctiveness of the Aesthetical). Vol. 1. М.: Progress, 1985. P. 161.
[37] Zeldmayer H. Art and Truth: Theory and Method of History of Art. М.: Iskusstvoznaniye, 1999. P. 93
[38] Foucault М. The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. М.: Progress, 1977. P. 41.
[39] Ibid.
[40] Cassirer E. Selected Works. Essay on Man. М.: Gardariki, 1998. P. 156.
[41] Cassirer E. Kant’s Life and Thought. SPb.: Universitetskaya Kniga, 1997. P. 148.
[42] Ibid. P. 149.
[43] Ibid. P. 150.
[44] Ibid. P. 326.
[45] Deleuze G., Guattari F. What Is Philosophy? М.: Akademitchesky Proekt, 2009. P. 6.
[46] Cassirer E. Op. cit. P. 246.
[47] Lukacs G. Ibid. P. 288.
[48] Ibid. P. 122.
[49] Adorno Т. Negative Dialectic. М.: Nautchny Mir, 2003. P. 23.
[50] Hegel G.W.F. Aesthetics. V. 1. М.: Iskusstvo, 1968. P. 17.
[51] Cassirer E. Kant’s Life and Thought. SPb.: Universitetskaya Kniga, 1997. P. 78.
[52] Ibid. P. 304.
[53] Habermas J. The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity. М.: Ves Mir, 2003. P. 52.
[54] Heim R. Hegel und seinem Zeit (Hegel and His Time) . SPb: Nauka, 2006. P. 342.
[55] Ibid. P. 258.
[56] Ibid. P. 260.
[57] Ibid. P. 267.
[58] Ibid.
[59] Ibid. P. 271.
[60] Habermas J. Op. cit. P. 11.
[61] Bazin G. Histoire de L`histoire De L`art. De Vasary a Nos Jours (The History of History of Art from Vasari to Nowadays). М.: Progress-Kultura, 1995. P. 109.
[62] Cassirer E. Kant’s Life and Thought. P. 380.
[63] Adorno Т. Op. cit. P. 102.
[64] Ibid. P. 103.
[65] Ibid. P. 23.
[66] Berdyaev N.А. The Philosophy of Freedom. The Sense of Creativity. М.: Pravda, 1989. P. 269.
[67] Deleuze G., Guattari F. Op. cit. P. 131.
[68] Adorno Т. Op. cit. P. 340.
[69] Kozyrev A.P. Solovyov and Gnostics. М.: Publishing House Savin S.A., 2007. P. 13.
[70] Jaspers K. Nietzsche. An Introduction to the Understanding of His Philosophical Activity. SPb: Vladimir Dal, 2004. P. 378.
[71] Guardini R. The End of the Modern World // Questions of Philisophy. 1990. № 4. P. 137.
[72] Jaspers K. Nietzsche. An Introduction to the Understanding of His Philosophical Activity. P. 346.
[73] Horkheimer М., Adorno Т. Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments. М.-SPb.: Medium, Yuventa, 1997. P. 8.
[74] Khrenov N.A. The Crisis of Art in the 20th Century: Art Statement and Culturological Interpretation // Questions of Culturology. 2011. № 1.
[75] Adorno Т. Op. cit. P. 323.
[76] Ibid. P. 327.
[77] Khrenov N.A. The Renaissance in domestic aesthetics of the late 1950s – early 1960s onwards in the context of the formation of the ideational culture type // Iskusstvoznaniye. 2009. № 1-2.
[78] Bytchkov V.V. Russian Theurgic Aesthetics. М.: Ladomir, 2007.
[79] Motroshilova N.V. Civiliation and Barbarism in the Age of Global Crises. М.: IFRAN, «Kanon+» ROOI «Reabilitatsya», 2010.
[80] Motroshilova N.V. S. Frank and N. Berdyaev on “New Barbarism” // Culture and Form: to the 60th Anniversary of A.L. Dobrokhotov / Proceedings. М.: ID GU- VSE, 2010.

 

 

ISSN 2311-3723

Founder:
OOO «Soglasie» publisher

Publisher:
Scientific Association of Culture Researchers

Official registration № ЭЛ № ФС 77 – 56414 от 11.12.2013

The magazine is indexed:

Issued quarterly in electronic form only

 

Issue produced by:

Editorial Director
A. Flier

Editor in Chief
T. Glazkova

Head of IT Center
A. Lukyanov

 

Our banner:

Our e-mail:
cultschool@gmail.com

 

 
 

OUR PARTNERS:

РУС ENG