Culture of culture

Scientific peer-reviewed electronic periodical
Since 2014




A.Ya. Flier. Cultural values and institutions: the relationship of concepts




A.Ya.Flier. Structuring culture according to its socio-functional specializations

N.A. Khrenov. A sociological turn in science. About the art of the XIX century: I. Ten's concept as an anticipation of a cultural turn (continued)

V.M. Rozin. Non-traditional, socio-cultural understanding of the book by Meer Shalev "Fontanella" (beginning)



HIGH ART IN MODERN CULTURE (E.N. Shapinskaya's Section)

E.N. Shapinskaya. Mass media in culture and society: from the history of cultural thought


V.M. Rozin. The history of stand-up on the example of the "Amazing Mrs. Maisel" or the mosaic consciousness of modern viewers of TV series?

N.A. Khrenov. The Superman in the Russian version: philosophical aspects of the novel by F. Dostoevsky's "Demons" and V. Khotinenko's film based on this novel (ending)

A.Ya. Flier. Experience of comparing parameters of social types of modern subcultures

I.G. Antipova. Psychology and culture: perspectives of contextualism

Announcement of the next issue


Antipova Irina Gennadievna,
PhD psychology, Associate professor
department of educational psychology
Southern Federal University


Рsychology and Culture: perspectives of contextualism

Abstract. The methodology of psychology analysis is an urgent problem, since psychology is a social technology. Psychology is becoming an increasingly effective technology for shaping the individual and communities. It is necessary to clarify the methodology for the analysis of psychology. The article analyzes the possibilities and limitations of the contextualism program. The article explores the application of contextualism in the study of psychology. Methodology of analysis: cultural concept of A.A. Pelipenko, program of social epistemology (I.T. Kasavin). Conclusions.  The methodology of contextualism is widely used to study psychological technologies. Contextualism is limited in its assessment of psychology as a social technology. These limitations are that psychology uses methods of constructing contexts.

Keywords. Psychology, culture, contextualism, context, social technologies, concept of A.A. Pelipenko, social epistemology, I.T. Kasavin, construction.

[1] Kasavin I.T. Introduction. On the empirical basis of social technology research: typological considerations. // Science and Social Technologies. Ed. I.T. Kasavin. M.: IF RAS. 2011. p. 3.
[2] Kasavin I.T. Social technologies and scientific knowledge. // Epistemology & Philosophy of Science. 2010. Vol. XXVI. N 4. P. 5.
[3] Mikeshina L.A. Dialogue of cognitive practices. From the History of Epistemology and Philosophy of Science. Moscow: ROSSPEN, 2010. p. 8.
[4] Kasavin I.T. Context. // Encyclopedia of Epistemology and Philosophy of Science. / Compiled by I.T. Kasavin. M.: Canon. Rehabilitation. 2009. 1248 p. [Electronic resource]. URL: 0%BD%D1%82%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%81%D1%82 (Accessed: 1.03.2019).
[5] Porus V.N. Contextualism in the Philosophy of Science // Epistemology & Philosophy of Science. 2018. N 2. P. 79.
[6] Kasavin I.T. Context.
[7] DeRose K. Contextualism and Knowledge Attributions [Electronic resource] // Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.1992. Vol. 52. No. 4 (Dec.). pp. 913-929. [electronic resource]. URL: (Accessed: 1.06.2019).
[8] Antonovsky A.Yu. Semantic contextualism and the problem of non-standard knowledge. // Epistemology & Philosophy of Science. 2010. Vol. XXVI. N 4. C. 117.
[9] Dretske F. Epistemic Operators. // The Journal of Philosophy.1970.Vol. 67. No. 24 (Dec.). p. 1007-1023. [electronic resource]. URL: / 2024710?refreqid=excelsior%3A86856fce48c77ef8f1938058a1548943 (Accessed: 1.06.2019).
[10] Rysiew P. Epistemic Contextualism // The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2021 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL: / archives/spr2021/entries/contextualism-epistemology/ (Accessed: 1.06.2019).
[11] Stolyarova O.E. Extension of the cognitive and the question of the social context. Philosophical sciences. 2010. No. 11. pp. 78-87.
[12] Gerasimova I.A. The problem of duality in the context of comparative studies // Epistemology & Philosophy of Science. 2009. Vol. XXV. N 4. pp. 103- 122. URL: (Accessed: 1.06.2019).
[13] Stepin V.S. Civilization and culture. St. Petersburg : SPbGUP, 2011. 408 p
[14] Flier A.Ya. Culturology as a scientific paradigm. // Culture of culture. 2015.No. 2. [Electronic resource] URL: / (Accessed: 1.10.2019).
[15] Flier A.Ya. Algorithm of interpretation of cultural artifacts
in education. // Culture of culture. 2018. No. 1. [Electronic resource]. URL: / (Accessed: 1.09.2021).
[16] Drach G.V. On cultural variability and social dynamics (referring to the works of A.Ya. Flier). // Culture of culture. 2021. No. 1. [Electronic resource]. URL: / (Accessed: 1.09.2021).
[17] Grishina N.V. The problem of conceptualization of context in modern psychology. // Social Psychology and Society. 2018. Vol. 9. No. 3. p. 11.
[18] Kalashnikov V.G. Contextual approach as a methodology of psychological research. St. Petersburg: Nestor-History, 2019. From 10.
[19] Stolyarova E.O. The third wave of science research as a philosophical justification of STS. // Logo. 2018. No. 5 (126). pp. 31-52.
[20] Flier A.Ya. Culturology as a scientific paradigm. // Culture of culture. 2015.No. 2. [Electronic resource] URL: / Date of reference: 1.06.2021).
[21] Flier A.Ya. The key question of culture: "Why?". // Culture of culture. 2016. No. 3. [Electronic resource] URL: / (Accessed: 1.06.2021).
[22] Pelipenko A.A., Yakovenko I.G. Culture as a system. M.: Languages of Russian culture, 1998. P. 29.



ISSN 2311-3723

OOO «Soglasie» publisher

Scientific Association of Culture Researchers

Official registration № ЭЛ № ФС 77 – 56414 от 11.12.2013

The magazine is indexed:

Issued quarterly in electronic form only


Issue produced by:

Editorial Director
A. Flier

Editor in Chief
T. Glazkova

Head of IT Center
A. Lukyanov


Our banner:

Our e-mail: