Электронный журнал «Культура культуры» :: Рsychology and Culture: perspectives of contextualism

SCIENTIFIC AND EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY FOR CULTURAL STUDIES
SCIENTIFIC ASSOCIATION OF CULTURE RESEARCHERS

Scientific peer-reviewed electronic periodical
Since 2014

Hypotheses:

ANTHROPOLOGY

V.I. Ionesov. Anthropology of Things in the Subject Articulations of Culture

Discussions:

IN SEARCH OF THE MEANING OF HISTORY AND CULTURE (A.Ya. Flier's section)

A.Ya. Flier. Culture as normative social behavior

N.A. Khrenov. The Russian Revolution from the point of view of the transitional situation in the history of culture. Rehabilitation of the Imperial complex as a consequence of the period of reaction in the history of the Revolution (beginning)

V.M. Rozin. Evolution of ideas about thinking

A.A. Pelipenko. The subject of civilization after the Dualistic Revolution (beginning)

Analytics:

CULTURAL REFLECTIONS

A.Ya. Flier. Myth and the problem of interpretation of culture

N.A. Khrenov. Culture and technology: from the organ projection of E. Kappa to the objectification of the spirit of Hegel (Semiotic turn in the culture of the twentieth century) (beginning)

V.M. Rozin. Tops and the peculiarity of consciousness

REPUBLICATION

O.N. Astafieva, A.Ya. Flier. Socio-cultural modernization: the formation of a new cultural environment

Announcement of the next issue

Antipova Irina Gennadievna,
PhD psychology, Associate professor
department of educational psychology
Southern Federal University

Рsychology and Culture: perspectives of contextualism

Abstract. The methodology of psychology analysis is an urgent problem, since psychology is a social technology. Psychology is becoming an increasingly effective technology for shaping the individual and communities. It is necessary to clarify the methodology for the analysis of psychology. The article analyzes the possibilities and limitations of the contextualism program. The article explores the application of contextualism in the study of psychology. Methodology of analysis: cultural concept of A.A. Pelipenko, program of social epistemology (I.T. Kasavin). Conclusions. The methodology of contextualism is widely used to study psychological technologies. Contextualism is limited in its assessment of psychology as a social technology. These limitations are that psychology uses methods of constructing contexts.

Keywords. Psychology, culture, contextualism, context, social technologies, concept of A.A. Pelipenko, social epistemology, I.T. Kasavin, construction.

[1] Kasavin I.T. Introduction. On the empirical basis of social technology research: typological considerations. // Science and Social Technologies. Ed. I.T. Kasavin. M.: IF RAS. 2011. p. 3.
[2] Kasavin I.T. Social technologies and scientific knowledge. // Epistemology & Philosophy of Science. 2010. Vol. XXVI. N 4. P. 5.
[3] Mikeshina L.A. Dialogue of cognitive practices. From the History of Epistemology and Philosophy of Science. Moscow: ROSSPEN, 2010. p. 8.
[4] Kasavin I.T. Context. // Encyclopedia of Epistemology and Philosophy of Science. / Compiled by I.T. Kasavin. M.: Canon. Rehabilitation. 2009. 1248 p. [Electronic resource]. URL: https://gufo.me/dict/epistemology_encyclopedia/%D0%BA%D0%BE%D 0%BD%D1%82%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%81%D1%82 (Accessed: 1.03.2019).
[5] Porus V.N. Contextualism in the Philosophy of Science // Epistemology & Philosophy of Science. 2018. N 2. P. 79.
[6] Kasavin I.T. Context.
[7] DeRose K. Contextualism and Knowledge Attributions [Electronic resource] // Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.1992. Vol. 52. No. 4 (Dec.). pp. 913-929. [electronic resource]. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2107917 (Accessed: 1.06.2019).
[8] Antonovsky A.Yu. Semantic contextualism and the problem of non-standard knowledge. // Epistemology & Philosophy of Science. 2010. Vol. XXVI. N 4. C. 117.
[9] Dretske F. Epistemic Operators. // The Journal of Philosophy.1970.Vol. 67. No. 24 (Dec.). p. 1007-1023. [electronic resource]. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable / 2024710?refreqid=excelsior%3A86856fce48c77ef8f1938058a1548943 (Accessed: 1.06.2019).
[10] Rysiew P. Epistemic Contextualism // The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2021 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL: https://plato.stanford.edu / archives/spr2021/entries/contextualism-epistemology/ (Accessed: 1.06.2019).
[11] Stolyarova O.E. Extension of the cognitive and the question of the social context. Philosophical sciences. 2010. No. 11. pp. 78-87.
[12] Gerasimova I.A. The problem of duality in the context of comparative studies // Epistemology & Philosophy of Science. 2009. Vol. XXV. N 4. pp. 103- 122. URL: https://www.pdcnet.org/eps/content/eps_2009_0022_0004_0103_0122 (Accessed: 1.06.2019).
[13] Stepin V.S. Civilization and culture. St. Petersburg : SPbGUP, 2011. 408 p
[14] Flier A.Ya. Culturology as a scientific paradigm. // Culture of culture. 2015.No. 2. [Electronic resource] URL: http://cult-cult.ru/cultural-studies-as-a-research-paradigm / (Accessed: 1.10.2019).
[15] Flier A.Ya. Algorithm of interpretation of cultural artifacts
in education. // Culture of culture. 2018. No. 1. [Electronic resource]. URL: http://cult-cult.ru/algoritm-interpretacii-kuliturnyh-artefaktov-v-obrazovanii / (Accessed: 1.09.2021).
[16] Drach G.V. On cultural variability and social dynamics (referring to the works of A.Ya. Flier). // Culture of culture. 2021. No. 1. [Electronic resource]. URL: http://cult-cult.ru/on-cultural-variability-and-social-dynamics / (Accessed: 1.09.2021).
[17] Grishina N.V. The problem of conceptualization of context in modern psychology. // Social Psychology and Society. 2018. Vol. 9. No. 3. p. 11.
[18] Kalashnikov V.G. Contextual approach as a methodology of psychological research. St. Petersburg: Nestor-History, 2019. From 10.
[19] Stolyarova E.O. The third wave of science research as a philosophical justification of STS. // Logo. 2018. No. 5 (126). pp. 31-52.
[20] Flier A.Ya. Culturology as a scientific paradigm. // Culture of culture. 2015.No. 2. [Electronic resource] URL: http://cult-cult.ru/cultural-studies-as-a-research-paradigm / Date of reference: 1.06.2021).
[21] Flier A.Ya. The key question of culture: "Why?". // Culture of culture. 2016. No. 3. [Electronic resource] URL: http://cult-cult.ru/the-key-question-of-culture-what-for / (Accessed: 1.06.2021).
[22] Pelipenko A.A., Yakovenko I.G. Culture as a system. M.: Languages of Russian culture, 1998. P. 29.

ISSN 2311-3723

Founder:
OOO «Soglasie» publisher

Publisher:
Scientific Association of Culture Researchers

Official registration № ЭЛ № ФС 77 – 56414 от 11.12.2013

The magazine is indexed:

Issued quarterly in electronic form only

Issue produced by:

Editorial Director
A. Flier

Editor in Chief
T. Glazkova

Head of IT Center
A. Lukyanov

Our banner:

Our e-mail:
cultschool@gmail.com

OUR PARTNERS:

SCIENTIFIC AND EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY FOR CULTURAL STUDIES SCIENTIFIC ASSOCIATION OF CULTURE RESEARCHERS Scientific peer-reviewed electronic periodical Since 2014
	NEW ISSUE ABOUT EDITORS TO AUTORS ARCHIVE	РУС ENG

Hypotheses: ANTHROPOLOGY V.I. Ionesov. Anthropology of Things in the Subject Articulations of Culture Discussions: IN SEARCH OF THE MEANING OF HISTORY AND CULTURE (A.Ya. Flier's section) A.Ya. Flier. Culture as normative social behavior N.A. Khrenov. The Russian Revolution from the point of view of the transitional situation in the history of culture. Rehabilitation of the Imperial complex as a consequence of the period of reaction in the history of the Revolution (beginning) V.M. Rozin. Evolution of ideas about thinking A.A. Pelipenko. The subject of civilization after the Dualistic Revolution (beginning) Analytics: CULTURAL REFLECTIONS A.Ya. Flier. Myth and the problem of interpretation of culture N.A. Khrenov. Culture and technology: from the organ projection of E. Kappa to the objectification of the spirit of Hegel (Semiotic turn in the culture of the twentieth century) (beginning) V.M. Rozin. Tops and the peculiarity of consciousness REPUBLICATION O.N. Astafieva, A.Ya. Flier. Socio-cultural modernization: the formation of a new cultural environment Announcement of the next issue	Antipova Irina Gennadievna, PhD psychology, Associate professor department of educational psychology Southern Federal University Рsychology and Culture: perspectives of contextualism Abstract. The methodology of psychology analysis is an urgent problem, since psychology is a social technology. Psychology is becoming an increasingly effective technology for shaping the individual and communities. It is necessary to clarify the methodology for the analysis of psychology. The article analyzes the possibilities and limitations of the contextualism program. The article explores the application of contextualism in the study of psychology. Methodology of analysis: cultural concept of A.A. Pelipenko, program of social epistemology (I.T. Kasavin). Conclusions. The methodology of contextualism is widely used to study psychological technologies. Contextualism is limited in its assessment of psychology as a social technology. These limitations are that psychology uses methods of constructing contexts. Keywords. Psychology, culture, contextualism, context, social technologies, concept of A.A. Pelipenko, social epistemology, I.T. Kasavin, construction. [1] Kasavin I.T. Introduction. On the empirical basis of social technology research: typological considerations. // Science and Social Technologies. Ed. I.T. Kasavin. M.: IF RAS. 2011. p. 3. [2] Kasavin I.T. Social technologies and scientific knowledge. // Epistemology & Philosophy of Science. 2010. Vol. XXVI. N 4. P. 5. [3] Mikeshina L.A. Dialogue of cognitive practices. From the History of Epistemology and Philosophy of Science. Moscow: ROSSPEN, 2010. p. 8. [4] Kasavin I.T. Context. // Encyclopedia of Epistemology and Philosophy of Science. / Compiled by I.T. Kasavin. M.: Canon. Rehabilitation. 2009. 1248 p. [Electronic resource]. URL: https://gufo.me/dict/epistemology_encyclopedia/%D0%BA%D0%BE%D 0%BD%D1%82%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%81%D1%82 (Accessed: 1.03.2019). [5] Porus V.N. Contextualism in the Philosophy of Science // Epistemology & Philosophy of Science. 2018. N 2. P. 79. [6] Kasavin I.T. Context. [7] DeRose K. Contextualism and Knowledge Attributions [Electronic resource] // Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.1992. Vol. 52. No. 4 (Dec.). pp. 913-929. [electronic resource]. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2107917 (Accessed: 1.06.2019). [8] Antonovsky A.Yu. Semantic contextualism and the problem of non-standard knowledge. // Epistemology & Philosophy of Science. 2010. Vol. XXVI. N 4. C. 117. [9] Dretske F. Epistemic Operators. // The Journal of Philosophy.1970.Vol. 67. No. 24 (Dec.). p. 1007-1023. [electronic resource]. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable / 2024710?refreqid=excelsior%3A86856fce48c77ef8f1938058a1548943 (Accessed: 1.06.2019). [10] Rysiew P. Epistemic Contextualism // The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2021 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL: https://plato.stanford.edu / archives/spr2021/entries/contextualism-epistemology/ (Accessed: 1.06.2019). [11] Stolyarova O.E. Extension of the cognitive and the question of the social context. Philosophical sciences. 2010. No. 11. pp. 78-87. [12] Gerasimova I.A. The problem of duality in the context of comparative studies // Epistemology & Philosophy of Science. 2009. Vol. XXV. N 4. pp. 103- 122. URL: https://www.pdcnet.org/eps/content/eps_2009_0022_0004_0103_0122 (Accessed: 1.06.2019). [13] Stepin V.S. Civilization and culture. St. Petersburg : SPbGUP, 2011. 408 p [14] Flier A.Ya. Culturology as a scientific paradigm. // Culture of culture. 2015.No. 2. [Electronic resource] URL: http://cult-cult.ru/cultural-studies-as-a-research-paradigm / (Accessed: 1.10.2019). [15] Flier A.Ya. Algorithm of interpretation of cultural artifacts in education. // Culture of culture. 2018. No. 1. [Electronic resource]. URL: http://cult-cult.ru/algoritm-interpretacii-kuliturnyh-artefaktov-v-obrazovanii / (Accessed: 1.09.2021). [16] Drach G.V. On cultural variability and social dynamics (referring to the works of A.Ya. Flier). // Culture of culture. 2021. No. 1. [Electronic resource]. URL: http://cult-cult.ru/on-cultural-variability-and-social-dynamics / (Accessed: 1.09.2021). [17] Grishina N.V. The problem of conceptualization of context in modern psychology. // Social Psychology and Society. 2018. Vol. 9. No. 3. p. 11. [18] Kalashnikov V.G. Contextual approach as a methodology of psychological research. St. Petersburg: Nestor-History, 2019. From 10. [19] Stolyarova E.O. The third wave of science research as a philosophical justification of STS. // Logo. 2018. No. 5 (126). pp. 31-52. [20] Flier A.Ya. Culturology as a scientific paradigm. // Culture of culture. 2015.No. 2. [Electronic resource] URL: http://cult-cult.ru/cultural-studies-as-a-research-paradigm / Date of reference: 1.06.2021). [21] Flier A.Ya. The key question of culture: "Why?". // Culture of culture. 2016. No. 3. [Electronic resource] URL: http://cult-cult.ru/the-key-question-of-culture-what-for / (Accessed: 1.06.2021). [22] Pelipenko A.A., Yakovenko I.G. Culture as a system. M.: Languages of Russian culture, 1998. P. 29.	ISSN 2311-3723 Founder: OOO «Soglasie» publisher Publisher: Scientific Association of Culture Researchers Official registration № ЭЛ № ФС 77 – 56414 от 11.12.2013 The magazine is indexed: Issued quarterly in electronic form only *Issue produced by:* Editorial Director A. Flier Editor in Chief T. Glazkova Head of IT Center A. Lukyanov Our banner: Our e-mail: cultschool@gmail.com OUR PARTNERS:

	NEW ISSUE ABOUT EDITORS TO AUTORS ARCHIVE	РУС ENG
Разработка сайта Мнение редакции может не совпадать с мнением авторов. При полном или частичном использовании материалов ссылка на «Культуру культуры» обязательна. © Научная ассоциация исследователей культуры, 2014-2023