Culture of culture

Scientific peer-reviewed electronic periodical
Since 2014




A.Ya. Flier. The phenomenon of prestigious consumption




A.Ya. Flier. Structuring culture according to the methods of social regulation

N.A. Khrenov. A sociological turn in science. About the art of the XIX century: I. Ten's concept as an anticipation of the cultural turn (continued)

V.M. Rozin. Non-traditional, socio-cultural interpretation of the book by Meer Shalev "Fontanella" (ending)



HIGH ART IN MODERN CULTURE (E.N. Shapinskaya'sSection)

E.N. Shapinskaya. "Storytelling" as a form of narrative in Modern Popular culture


A.Ya. Flier. Historical transformation of culture from admiration of the past to aspiration to the future

N.A. Khrenov. A man in a pandemic situation: excursions into history (beginning)

V.M. Rozin. Love in culture and family: yesterday and today (based on the novel by Meir Shalev "Two bears Came out of the forest")

V.I. Grachev. Knowledge and information in modern Cultural Studies: Paradoxes of similarities and differences of content

Announcement of the next issue



Khrenov Nikolai Andreevich,
Doctor of Philosophy, Professor,
the Gerasimov Russian State
University of Cinematography

Synthesis of arts as a synthesis of cultures: V. Kandinsky And S. Eisenstein

Abstract. The article is devoted to the study of the phenomenon of artistic avant-garde in the national culture of the first half of the twentieth century, the origin and basic creative and cultural principles of avant-garde. Directly these problems are analyzed on the example of creativity of V. Kandinsky and R. Eisenstein taking into account features of a cultural context of their activity.

Keywords. Art, avant-garde, new meanings, new forms, tradition, innovation.

[1] Hansen-Leve O. Russian formalism. Methodological reconstruction of development based on the principle of exclusion. M.: Languages of Russian culture, 2001. P. 17.
[2] Panofsky E. Idea. On the history of concepts in art theories. From antiquity to classicism. SPb.: Ed. "Andrey Heirs", 2002.
[3] Jung K. the structure of the psyche and the process of individuation. M.: Science, 1966. P. 30.
[4] Ibid. P. 31.
[5] Ibid. P. 32.
[6] Yampolsky M. Observer. Essays on the history of vision. M.: Ad Marginem, 2000.
[7] Yampolsky M. The World Of The Visible. Essays on early Kinopanorama. M.: film Studies notes, 1993.
[8] Yampolsky M. Observer. P. 8.
[9] Berdyaev N. Philosophy of creativity, culture and art. VOLUME. 2., M.: Art, 1994. P. 404.
[10] Yampolsky M. Observer. P. 48.
[11] Jacobson R. Movie Over? / The structure of the film. M.: Rainbow, 1984. P. 25.
[12] Eisenstein S. Method. Thom. 2. M.: Eisenstein-centre; Museum of cinema, 2002. P.55.
[13] Ibid. P. 49.
[14] Ortega-and-Gasset H. the Aesthetics. Philosophy of culture. M.: Art, 1991. P. 220.
[15] Kandinsky V. Selected works on the theory of art. Thom. 1. M.: Gilea, 2001.
[16] Eisenstein S. Selected works. At 6 Vol. Thom. 2. M.: Art, 1964. P. 128.
[17] Eisenstein S. Memoirs. Thom. 2. M.: Work; Museum of cinema, 1997. P. 303.
[18] In Prokofiev. Art criticism, history of art, theory of the General artistic process: their specificity and problems of interaction within the limits of art // Soviet art history. Issue 2. M.: Soviet artist, 1978.
[19] Khrenov N. Art history as a history of culture / / Culture and art. 2011.  No. 1. P. 92.
[20] Grabar I. Letters. 1891-1917. M.: Science, 1974. P. 195.
[21] Ibid. P. 192.
[22] Berdyaev N. Philosophy of freedom. The meaning of creativity. M.: Izd. "The truth", 1989. P. 523.
[23] Eisenstein S. Method. Thom. 1. P. 47.
[24] Fuck N. Utopian complex of Russian art of the first half of the twentieth century: from the avant-garde to the Byzantine tradition / / upper Volga philological Bulletin. 2015.  No. 1. P. 171.
[25] P. Eisenstein's Decree. OP. P. 77.
[26] Popper K. open society and its enemies. Vol. 1. The Spell Of Plato. M.: Phoenix, 1992. P. 208.
[27] Ibid. P. 209.
[28] Hanzen-Leve O. Decree. op. P. 111.
[29] F. Stepun the Mystical world-view. Five images of Russian symbolism. SPb.: Ed. "Vladimir Dal", 2012.
[30] Eisenstein S. Method. Vol. 2. P. 61.
[31] Vasari D. Biographies of the most famous painters, sculptors and architects. Vol. 1. M.: Art, 1956. P. 154.
[32] Makovsky S. On the Parnassus of the Silver age. M.: Twenty-first century-Harmony, 2000. P. 483.
[33] In Kandinsky. Decree. op. Vol. 2. P. 25.
[34] In Turchyn. Century XIX century XX-th // Twentieth century and the ways of European culture. M: GII, 2000. P. 35.
[35] Eisenstein S. Method. Vol. 1. P. 112.
[36] Kandinsky V. Decree. op. Vol.1. P.105.
[37] Kandinsky V. Decree. op. Vol. 1. P. 106.
[38] Mandelstam O. Word and culture. M.: Soviet pisatel’, 1987. P. 42.
[39] Kandinsky V. Decree. op. 2. P. 246.
[40] Kandinsky V. Decree. op. Vol. 1. P. 292.
[41] Kandinsky V. Decree. op. Vol. 1. P. 320.
[42] Voloshin M. Archaism in Russian painting (Roerich, Bogaevsky and Bakst) // Apollo. 1909.  No. 1. P. 50.
[43] Schmidt I. The main problems of theory and history. L.: Academia, 1925.
[44] Kandinsky V. Decree. op. Vol. 1. P. 239.
[45] Kandinsky V. Decree. op. Vol. 2. P. 51.
[46] Kandinsky V. Decree. op. Vol. 2. P. 54.
[47] Kandinsky V. Decree. op. Vol. 2. P. 267.
[48] Kandinsky V. Decree. op. Vol. 2. P. 262.
[49] Hanzen-Leve O. Decree. op. P. 184.
[50] Eisenstein S. Method. Vol. 1. P. 436.
[51] Ibid.
[52] Ibid. Vol. 2. P. 327.
[53] Kandinsky V. Decree. op. Vol. 2. P. 71.
[54] Decree P. Decree. op. Vol. 1. P. 46.



ISSN 2311-3723

OOO «Soglasie» publisher

Scientific Association of Culture Researchers

Official registration № ЭЛ № ФС 77 – 56414 от 11.12.2013

The magazine is indexed:

Issued quarterly in electronic form only


Issue produced by:

Editorial Director
A. Flier

Editor in Chief
T. Glazkova

Head of IT Center
A. Lukyanov


Our banner:

Our e-mail: