Rozin Vadim Markovich,
Doctor of Philosophy, Professor,
Leading Researcher,
Institute of Philosophy of
the Russian Academy of Sciences
e-mail: rozinvm@gmail.com

Sociology and cultural studies:
semantic and conceptual differences and intersections
(Ending)

Abstract.  Sociology and cultural studies, in particular, can be attributed to social Sciences, but in this case, you need to understand what their specificity as social Sciences. To promote the stated topic, the author analyzes works of the classics of sociology and cultural studies, examines the stages of development of sociology and cultural studies, offers a methodological reconstruction of the way of thinking in these scientific disciplines. In particular, he tries to show that the sociological and cultural knowledge and concepts are based on patterns; their basis is then formed ideal objects and concepts of these Sciences. V. rosin argues that the social phenomenon is not an object but a process, a cycle, beginning with the act of freedom and ending with the formation of social knowledge and machines (often social Institute), in which freedom is limited by social norms. Describing the modern understanding of culture, the author identifies several main meanings: culture as tradition, as a creation of the people as a whole in three different interpretations (biological, psychological and social), as the many cultures which exist in interaction and communication, as a field of thematicaly culture, finally, as cultural practices.

Key words. Sociology, cultural studies, social Sciences, anomie, discipline, science, concepts, meanings, schemas, reality, criticism, reflection, institutions.

[23] Aristotle. Politics // Aristotle. Op. in 4 tons of T.4. Moscow: Mysl', 1983. P. 571.
[24] Sergeev V.S. Essays on the history of ancient Rome. Moscow: OGIZ State Social and Economic Publishers, 1938. P. 130.
[25] Rozin V.M. Formation and features of social institutions. Cultural-historical and methodological analysis. M.: LENAND, 2014. 160 pp.
[26] Latour B. The reassembly of the social: an introduction to the actor-network theory. Moscow: Izd. house of the Higher School of Economics, 2014. Pp. 175, 355.
[27] Bauman Z. The relevance of the Holocaust. M.: Europe, 2010. P. 13.
[28] Neretina S.S. Points on sight. St. Petersburg: RKGA, 2005. Pp. 271, 273.
[29] Mezhuyev V.M. Philosophy is the essence of European culture // Philosophical sciences. 2000. № 1. P. 34.
[30] Ionin L.G. Sociology of culture. M.: Logos, 1996. P. 25.
[31] Neretina S.S., Ogurtsov A.P. Time of culture. St. Petersburg: RHCI. 2000. P. 344.
[32] Windelband B. Philosophy of Culture and Transcendental Idealism // Culturology. The twentieth century. Anthology. M.: Jurist, 1995. With. 67.
[33] Neretina S.S., Ogurtsov A.P. Op. cit.  Pp. 15, 16.
[34] Razlogov K.E. The problem of typology of cultures // Orientations of cultural policy. 2000. № 6. Pp. 10-16.
[35] Mezhuyev V.M. Philosophy is the essence of European culture // Philosophical sciences. 2000. № 1. P. 82.
[36] Neretina S.S., Ogurtsov A.P. Op. cit.  Pp. 14-15.
[37] Ibid. Pp. 37-38.
[38] Ibid. Pp. 10-11.
[39] Neretina S.S. Points on sight. P. 258.
[40] Ibid. 267.
[41] Benhabib S. Cultural claims. Equality and diversity in a global era. Moscow: Logos, 2003. Pp. 42, 43, 48.
[42] Rozin V.M. Resumption of culture in the conditions of its crisis and metamorphosis // Culture of Culture. 2014. № 4.