Vlasov Victor Georgievich,
Doctor of Art Studies, Professor of
St. Petersburg State University
natlukina@list.ru

Lukina Natalia Yurievna,
bibliographer and literary critic
natlukina@list.ru

Stanze 5, 6, 7, 8… From talks of the philologist with researcher of art

Abstract. The article continues the dialogue between the philologist and the theorist of fine arts, started in one of the previous issues of the journal. At this time the main topic was the naturalism in various forms of art and in the methods of the study of art. The authors agree that the discrepancy between research methods and the specifics of the subject testifies to the crisis of modern art history. Descriptive art history has outlived its usefulness, and cultural studies, despite some eclectic methodology and abstraction of the research language, can come closer to the complex phenomena of traditional and modern artistic practice.

Keywords. Art, fine arts, research methods, literature, music, naturalism, subject of study, realism, salon, synthesis of arts, eclecticism.


[1] Rudnev V. P. Dictionary of culture of the XX century. M.: Agraf, 1997. Pp. 252-255.
[2] Pasternak B. L. Poln. Coll. Op. with annexes: in 11 t. M.: Word, 2004. Vol. 10. P. 507.
[3] Fyodor Dostoyevsky The Idiot. Part three. VI // Dostoevsky F. M. Poln. Coll. Op.: in 30 vol. L.: Science, 1972-1990. Vol. 8, 1973. P. 181.
[4] E. Lemons diary of a loser or a Secret notebook. M.: Verb, 1992. P. 64, 178.
[5] Masalin N. V. Creativity I. K. Aivazovsky and early romantic category of the sublime // Questions of art. 1993.  No. 4. P. 86.
[6] Asafyev B. V. Russian painting. M.: Art, 1966. Pp. 124-125.
[7] Yakimovich A. K. Heinrich Wolflin and others. About the classic century art studies non-classical // Renaissance and Baroque. SPb.: Azbuka-Klassika, 2004. P. 20.