Электронный журнал «Культура культуры»

SCIENTIFIC AND EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY FOR CULTURAL STUDIES
SCIENTIFIC ASSOCIATION OF CULTURE RESEARCHERS

Scientific peer-reviewed electronic periodical
Since 2014

Hypotheses:

THE THEORY OF CULTURE

E.A. Orlova. The anthropological foundations of scientific knowledge

Discussions:

IN SEARCH OF THE MEANING OF HISTORY AND CULTURE (A.Ya. Flier's section)

A.V. Kostin, A.Ya. Flier. Ternary functional model of culture (continued)

N.A. Khrenov. Russian culture at the turn of the XIX–XX centuries: the Gnostic "Renaissance" in the context of symbolism (continued)

V.M. Rozin. Some features of modern art

V.I. Ionesov. Memory of things in images and plots of cultural introspection

Analytics:

CULTURAL REFLECTIONS

A.Ya. Flier. Social and organizational functions of culture

M.I. Kozyakova. The Ancient cosmos and its evolution: ritual, spectacle, entertainment

N.A. Malshina. The post-non-classical paradigm in the study of the Russian cultural industry: A new type of rationality and value system

N.A. Khrenov. A Century later: the tragic experience of Soviet Culture (continued)

Announcement of the next issue

Anna Vladimirovna Kostina,
Doctor of Philosophy, Doctor of Cultural Studies,
Professor, Vice-rector of Moscow State University for Scientific and
Educational Work, Director of the Institute
Fundamental and Applied Research, Head of the Department of Philosophy,
Cultural Studies and Political Science
Moscow University for the Humanities
e-mail: anna_kostina@inbox.ru

Andrey Yakovlevich Flier,
Doctor of Philosophy, Professor,
Chief Researcher
D.S. Likhachev Russian Research Institute of Cultural
and Natural Heritage,
Professor at Moscow State
Linguistic University.
e-mail: andrey.flier@yandex.ru

Ternary functional model of culture [1]

Abstract. This essay reflects a new understanding of the phenomenon of culture, which is divided into three social subcultures: elite (creative), folk (traditional) and mass (consumer). This interpretation is based on the hypothesis of A.V. Kostina that the creators and consumers of these subcultures differ in the type of social psychology, attitude to life and awareness of their own social role, and the hypothesis of A.Ya. Flier that these three subcultures concentrate different ways of adapting to external conditions of existence and implement three different models of translation social experience. Both hypotheses organically converged in a joint study.

Keywords: culture, social subcultures, psychology, interests, traditions, innovations, consumerism.

[1] This essay was written in 2009 and published in the book: Kostina A.V., Flier A.Ya. Culture: between slavery of conjuncture, slavery of custom and slavery of status. M.: Soglasie, 2010. pp. 15-130.
[2] In fact, E.S. Markaryan writes about this, noting that the formation of common concepts becomes possible only if "we are able to abstract from the distinctive specific features of each of the ... temporary states and highlight the common features inherent in them" (E.S. Markaryan Essays on the theory of culture. Yerevan: Publishing House of the Academy of Sciences of the Armenian SSR, 1969. P. 119).
[3] Drobnitsky O.G. The concept of morality. M. Nauka, 1974. P. 322.
[4] Lem S. Philosophy of the Case. M.: AST, 2005. p. 390.
[5] Simmel G. The concept and tragedy of culture // Simmel G. Favorites. Vol. 1. Philosophy of culture. Moscow: Yurist, 1996.
[6] Flier A.Ya. Cultural genesis. M.: RIK, 1995.
[7] Kostina A.V. National culture – ethnic culture – mass culture: "Balance of interests" in modern society. Moscow: URSS, 2009.
[8] Vital time, in our opinion, is embodied in biologically produced people.
[9] In passing, let us make the assumption that the pace of social history is accelerating due to the fact that in the course of history there is an increase and deepening of the specialization of human activity (professional specialization). And since innovations in any activity are generated mainly by narrow specialists, as specialization deepens, the dynamics of innovation generation also increases. And so on from century to century. At one time it was called progress, but nowadays it is commonly called a technological revolution.
[10] Ilyenkov E.V. The problem of the ideal // Questions of philosophy. 1979. No. 6. p. 140.

ISSN 2311-3723

Founder:
OOO «Soglasie» publisher

Publisher:
Scientific Association of Culture Researchers

Official registration № ЭЛ № ФС 77 – 56414 от 11.12.2013

The magazine is indexed:

Issued quarterly in electronic form only

Issue produced by:

Editorial Director
A. Flier

Editor in Chief
T. Glazkova

Head of IT Center
A. Lukyanov

Our banner:

Our e-mail:
cultschool@gmail.com

OUR PARTNERS:

SCIENTIFIC AND EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY FOR CULTURAL STUDIES SCIENTIFIC ASSOCIATION OF CULTURE RESEARCHERS Scientific peer-reviewed electronic periodical Since 2014
	NEW ISSUE ABOUT EDITORS TO AUTORS ARCHIVE	РУС ENG

Hypotheses: THE THEORY OF CULTURE E.A. Orlova. The anthropological foundations of scientific knowledge Discussions: IN SEARCH OF THE MEANING OF HISTORY AND CULTURE (A.Ya. Flier's section) A.V. Kostin, A.Ya. Flier. Ternary functional model of culture (continued) N.A. Khrenov. Russian culture at the turn of the XIX–XX centuries: the Gnostic "Renaissance" in the context of symbolism (continued) V.M. Rozin. Some features of modern art V.I. Ionesov. Memory of things in images and plots of cultural introspection Analytics: CULTURAL REFLECTIONS A.Ya. Flier. Social and organizational functions of culture M.I. Kozyakova. The Ancient cosmos and its evolution: ritual, spectacle, entertainment N.A. Malshina. The post-non-classical paradigm in the study of the Russian cultural industry: A new type of rationality and value system N.A. Khrenov. A Century later: the tragic experience of Soviet Culture (continued) Announcement of the next issue	Anna Vladimirovna Kostina, Doctor of Philosophy, Doctor of Cultural Studies, Professor, Vice-rector of Moscow State University for Scientific and Educational Work, Director of the Institute Fundamental and Applied Research, Head of the Department of Philosophy, Cultural Studies and Political Science Moscow University for the Humanities e-mail: anna_kostina@inbox.ru Andrey Yakovlevich Flier, Doctor of Philosophy, Professor, Chief Researcher D.S. Likhachev Russian Research Institute of Cultural and Natural Heritage, Professor at Moscow State Linguistic University. e-mail: andrey.flier@yandex.ru Ternary functional model of culture [1] Abstract. This essay reflects a new understanding of the phenomenon of culture, which is divided into three social subcultures: elite (creative), folk (traditional) and mass (consumer). This interpretation is based on the hypothesis of A.V. Kostina that the creators and consumers of these subcultures differ in the type of social psychology, attitude to life and awareness of their own social role, and the hypothesis of A.Ya. Flier that these three subcultures concentrate different ways of adapting to external conditions of existence and implement three different models of translation social experience. Both hypotheses organically converged in a joint study. Keywords: culture, social subcultures, psychology, interests, traditions, innovations, consumerism. [1] This essay was written in 2009 and published in the book: Kostina A.V., Flier A.Ya. Culture: between slavery of conjuncture, slavery of custom and slavery of status. M.: Soglasie, 2010. pp. 15-130. [2] In fact, E.S. Markaryan writes about this, noting that the formation of common concepts becomes possible only if "we are able to abstract from the distinctive specific features of each of the ... temporary states and highlight the common features inherent in them" (E.S. Markaryan Essays on the theory of culture. Yerevan: Publishing House of the Academy of Sciences of the Armenian SSR, 1969. P. 119). [3] Drobnitsky O.G. The concept of morality. M. Nauka, 1974. P. 322. [4] Lem S. Philosophy of the Case. M.: AST, 2005. p. 390. [5] Simmel G. The concept and tragedy of culture // Simmel G. Favorites. Vol. 1. Philosophy of culture. Moscow: Yurist, 1996. [6] Flier A.Ya. Cultural genesis. M.: RIK, 1995. [7] Kostina A.V. National culture – ethnic culture – mass culture: "Balance of interests" in modern society. Moscow: URSS, 2009. [8] Vital time, in our opinion, is embodied in biologically produced people. [9] In passing, let us make the assumption that the pace of social history is accelerating due to the fact that in the course of history there is an increase and deepening of the specialization of human activity (professional specialization). And since innovations in any activity are generated mainly by narrow specialists, as specialization deepens, the dynamics of innovation generation also increases. And so on from century to century. At one time it was called progress, but nowadays it is commonly called a technological revolution. [10] Ilyenkov E.V. The problem of the ideal // Questions of philosophy. 1979. No. 6. p. 140.	ISSN 2311-3723 Founder: OOO «Soglasie» publisher Publisher: Scientific Association of Culture Researchers Official registration № ЭЛ № ФС 77 – 56414 от 11.12.2013 The magazine is indexed: Issued quarterly in electronic form only *Issue produced by:* Editorial Director A. Flier Editor in Chief T. Glazkova Head of IT Center A. Lukyanov Our banner: Our e-mail: cultschool@gmail.com OUR PARTNERS:

	NEW ISSUE ABOUT EDITORS TO AUTORS ARCHIVE	РУС ENG
Разработка сайта Мнение редакции может не совпадать с мнением авторов. При полном или частичном использовании материалов ссылка на «Культуру культуры» обязательна. © Научная ассоциация исследователей культуры, 2014-2024