Rozin Vadim Markovich,
Doctor of Philosophy, Professor,
Leading Researcher,
Institute of Philosophy of
the Russian Academy of Sciences
e-mail: rozinvm@gmail.com

The methodological program of social and cultural study of sociality

Abstract. The article discusses the crisis situation in sociology and, in this regard, proposes a number of ideas aimed at building a methodological concept of sociality. It is noted that the crisis in sociology is caused by the transition of sociological research to interdisciplinary research. The principles (methodological, cultural-historical, phenomenological) that characterize the author's approach are formulated. This approach is compared with the sociological one. In the latter, four characteristics are distinguished: 1) an evaluation characteristic of sociality and an indication of the type of social action aimed at changing sociality, 2) a description of the mass behavior of people and the social order that determines this behavior, 3) a focus on the study of sociality and a description of the "social nature", 4) consideration of sociality only as a phenomenon of modern culture (the author contrasts this approach with the cultural and historical interpretation of sociality). In conclusion, the author outlines the stages of research and construction of the methodological concept of sociality.

Keywords. Crisis, sociology, principles, sociality, phenomenon, interdisciplinary approach, concept, methodology, social order.
 

[1] Malinowski B. A Scientific theory of culture. M.: OGI, 1998. Pp. 87-89.
[2] Rozin V.M. Theory of culture. Moscow: NOTA BENE, 2005. Pp. 226, 234.
[3] Ibid. P. 235.
[4] Rozin V.M. The Nature of sociality: problems of methodology and ontology of social Sciences. M: URSS, 2016. 288 p.
[5] Ibid.
[6] Ritter J. Modern sociological theories. SPb.: Peter, 2002. 688 p.
[7] Bauman Z. Thinking sociologically. M.: Aspect-Press, 1996. 255 p.
[8] Ibid. P. 10.
[9] Latur B. Social Reassembly: an introduction to actor-network theory. M.: Ed. house of the Higher school of Economics, 2014. P. 229.
[10] Kravchenko S. A. Sociology: paradigms through the prism of sociological imagination. M.: Exam, 2002. P.29-30.
[11] URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IDB5_afOpCE
[12] Ritter J. Decree. cit. P. 522.
[13] Rozin V.M. Formation and features of social institutions. Cultural-historical and methodological analysis. Moscow: LENAND, 2014. 160 C.; Rozin V.M. The Nature of sociality: problems of methodology and ontology of social Sciences; Rozin V.M. To the problem of demarcation of sociology and social Sciences // Ideas and ideals. 2017. N 3. Vol. 2. Pp. 3-17.
[14] Vygotsky L.S. History of development of higher mental functions // Vygotsky L.S. Collected Works: in 6 vol. Vol. 3. M.: Pedagogy, 1983. Pp. 15-16.
[15] Gaidenko P.P. Breakthrough to the transcendental. New ontology of the XX century. M.: Republic, 1997. P. 363-364.
[16] Ritter J. Decree. cit. Pp. 30-31.
[17] Bauman Z. Decree. cit. Pp. 242.
[18] Ibid. P. 16.
[19] Society // New philosophical encyclopedia. Vol. 3. Moscow: Mysl', 2001. P. 132.
[20] Latour B. The Decree. cit. P. 355.
[21] Aristotle. Works: in 4 vol. Vol. 4. Moscow: Mysl', 1983. P. 378-379.
[22] Ibid. Pp. 420, 445, 457, 467, 471.
[23] Ritter J. Decree. cit. P. 27.
[24] Ibid. P. 484.
[25] Rozin V.M. Culturology. M.: Gardariki, 2003. 462 p.; Rozin V.M. Cultural Studies. M.: Yurayt, 2018. 410 p.; Rozin V.M. Personality and its study. M.: URSS, 2012. 232 p.