SCIENTIFIC AND EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY FOR CULTURAL STUDIES
SCIENTIFIC ASSOCIATION OF CULTURE RESEARCHERS

Culture of culture

Scientific peer-reviewed electronic periodical
Since 2014

РУС ENG

Hypotheses:

THEORY OF CULTURE

A.Ya. Flier. A systematic model of the social functions of culture

 

Discussions:

IN SEARCH OF THE MEANING OF HISTORY AND CULTURE (A.Ya. Flier's column)

A.V. Kostina, A.Ya. Flier. Ternary functional model of culture (continued)

V.M. Rozin. Features and constitution of musical reality

N.A. Khrenov. Russian culture at the turn of the XIX-XX centuries: the Gnostic "Renaissance" in the context of symbolism (continued)

 

Analytics:

CULTURAL REFLECTIONS

I.V. Kondakov. The cat as a cultural hero: from Puss in Boots to Schrodinger's Cat

N.A. Khrenov. A Century later: the tragic experience of Soviet Culture (continued)

I.E. Isakas. Hypothesis. The Christmas tree is a symbol of the second coming of Christ

THE DUEL

A.Ya. Flier. Is culture inevitable? (on the limits of the social usefulness of culture) (Philosophical dystopia)

A.A. Pelipenko. Culture as an inevitability (on the subjective status of culture)


Announcement of the next issue

 


Nikolay Andreevich Khrenov,
Doctor of Philosophy, Professor,
All-Russian State University
of Cinematography named after S.A. Gerasimov,
e-mail: nihrenov@mail.ru

The Russian Revolution from the point of view of the transitional situation in the history of culture. Rehabilitation of the Imperial complex as a consequence of the period of reaction in the history of the revolution (ending)

Abstract. The article examines the process of desacralization of the revolution in modern Russian culture on the example of domestic cinema and the formation of a critical view of it. The main negative features of the revolution, which are emphasized by modern directors, and the general negative impact of the revolution on the development of cinematography in the USSR are also studied.

Keywords: revolution, cinema, desacralization, reflection, public consciousness, ideology.

 

[50] Sorokin P. Decree. op., p. 167.
[51] Ibid., p. 142.
[52] Ibid.
[54] Toynbee A. Civilization before the court of history. M.: Iris Press. 2003. p. 379.
[55] Ibid. p. 381.
[56] Ibid.
[57] Buldakov V. Decree. Op. C. 275.
[58] Ibid., p. 273.
[59] Monuments of literature of Ancient Russia. The end of the XV – the first half of the XV1 century. Vol. 6. M.: Fiction. 1984. p. 437.
[60] Eisenstein S. Selected works in 6 volumes. Vol. 6. M.: Art. 1971. p. 226.
[61] Monuments of literature of Ancient Russia. The end of the XV – the first half of the XV1 century.Decree. Op. vol. 6. p. 441.
[62] Kirillov I. The Third Rome. An essay on the historical development of the idea of Russian Messianism. M. 1914. C. 27.
[63] Malinin V. Elder of the Eliazarov monastery Philotheus and his epistles. Kyiv. 1901. C. 425.
[64] Ibid., pp. 531.
[65] Ibid., C. 532.
[66] Ibid., C. 533.
[67] Fedotov G. Letters about Russian culture // Fedotov G. Fate and sins of Russia. Selected articles on the philosophy of Russian history and culture. Vol. 2. St. Petersburg, 1992. p. 164.


 

 

ISSN 2311-3723

Founder:
OOO «Soglasie» publisher

Publisher:
Scientific Association of Culture Researchers

Official registration № ЭЛ № ФС 77 – 56414 от 11.12.2013

The magazine is indexed:

Issued quarterly in electronic form only

 

Issue produced by:

Editorial Director
A. Flier

Editor in Chief
T. Glazkova

Head of IT Center
A. Lukyanov

 

Our banner:

Our e-mail:
cultschool@gmail.com

 

 
 

OUR PARTNERS:

РУС ENG