SCIENTIFIC AND EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY FOR CULTURAL STUDIES
SCIENTIFIC ASSOCIATION OF CULTURE RESEARCHERS

Culture of culture

Scientific peer-reviewed electronic periodical
Since 2014

РУС ENG

Hypotheses:

THEORY OF CULTURE

A.Ya. Flier. Cultural values and institutions: the relationship of concepts

 

Discussions:

IN SEARCH OF THE MEANING OF HISTORY AND CULTURE (A.Ya. Flier's Section)

A.Ya.Flier. Structuring culture according to its socio-functional specializations

N.A. Khrenov. A sociological turn in science. About the art of the XIX century: I. Ten's concept as an anticipation of a cultural turn (continued)

V.M. Rozin. Non-traditional, socio-cultural understanding of the book by Meer Shalev "Fontanella" (beginning)

 

Analytics:

HIGH ART IN MODERN CULTURE (E.N. Shapinskaya's Section)

E.N. Shapinskaya. Mass media in culture and society: from the history of cultural thought

CULTURAL REFLECTIONS

V.M. Rozin. The history of stand-up on the example of the "Amazing Mrs. Maisel" or the mosaic consciousness of modern viewers of TV series?

N.A. Khrenov. The Superman in the Russian version: philosophical aspects of the novel by F. Dostoevsky's "Demons" and V. Khotinenko's film based on this novel (ending)

A.Ya. Flier. Experience of comparing parameters of social types of modern subcultures

I.G. Antipova. Psychology and culture: perspectives of contextualism


Announcement of the next issue

 


Khrenov Nikolay Andreevich,
Doctor of Philosophy, Professor,
All-Russian State University
of Cinematography named after S.A. Gerasimov.
e-mail: nihrenov@mail.ru

The Superman in the Russian version:
philosophical aspects of the novel by F. Dostoevsky's "Demons"
and V. Khotinenko's film based on this novel

(ending)

Abstract. The article analyzes the novel by F. Dostoevsky's "Demons". It also makes some observations on the attempt of director V. Khotinenko to present his cinematic incarnation. Realizing that during the adaptation of this novel, the criminal-adventurous theme usually comes to the fore (in general, such plots turn out well in the cinema, and this is due to the specifics of this art form), the author tries to analyze those philosophical meanings of the novel, without which the aesthetics and poetics of the works of F. Dostoevsky simply does not exist. Aiming to demonstrate the philosophical implications of the novel "Demons", the author shows that Dostoevsky's ideas are consonant with Western philosophy and not only of the nineteenth, but also of the twentieth century. Thus, S. Kierkegaard and F. Nietzsche appear in his field of vision. Through the prism of the philosophical ideas of these thinkers, the ideas of the novel "Demons" are considered. In this sense, attention is drawn to the author's desire to present the hero of the novel, Nikolai Stavrogin, with what F. Nietzsche calls a "superman". "Man-god" as a concept used by Dostoevsky in the novel is a synonym for "superman" by F. Nietzsche. Dostoevsky represents such a trend in philosophy, which in the twentieth century receives a designation as the philosophy of existentialism. Another representative of Russian existentialism, L. Shestov, reads Dostoevsky's later novels in this vein. Singling out Stavrogin's Demons among the characters of the novel, the author of this article seeks to show that the biography and ideas of this central hero in the novel, representing the sixties of the nineteenth century, or, more precisely, nihilists, must be considered in a long time, which began with the "Voltaire" of the XVIII century and ending with the decadence of the turn of the XIX-XX centuries. Dostoevsky anticipates not only the Russian Renaissance of the early twentieth century, designated today as the Silver Age, but also decadence. Thus, the author confirms the idea of D. Merezhkovsky, who presented Dostoevsky, as well as L. Tolstoy, by anticipating the heyday of Russian culture, which is known as the Silver Age with its spiritual breakthroughs, but also with longing and attraction to Thanatos.

Keywords. Dostoevsky, the novel "Demons", Kierkegaard, Nietzsche, V. Soloviev, L. Shestov, N. Berdyaev, S. Bulgakov, Kant, D. Merezhkovsky, Camus, nihilism, positivism, romanticism, superman, man-god, God-man, existentialism, Stavrogin, Verkhovensky, Bakunin, Nechaev, Marquis de Sade, decadence, Legend about the grand Inquisitor, the man from the underground, Plato's cave, big time, V. Khotinenko.


[71] Turgenev I. Three portraits // Turgenev I. Essays. Vol. 4. M., 1980. p. 86.
[72] Grigoriev A. Lermontov and his direction. // Time. No. 11. M., 1862. p. 51.
[73] Ibid. p. 65.
[74 ]Ibid. p. 70.
[75] Dostoevsky F. Collected works: in 15 vol. t. 7. Leningrad: Nauka. Leningrad branch. 1990. p. 269.
[76] Shcherbatov M. On the damage of morals in Russia by Prince M. Shcherbatov and the Journey of A. Radishchev. M., 1985. C. 42.
[77] Pylyaev M. Old Petersburg. Stories from the former life of the capital. St. Petersburg, 1887. C. 330.
[78] Ibid., p. 330.
[79] Aksakov S. Collected works: in 5 vols. Vol. 1. M., 1966. p. 101.
[80] Ibid., p. 106.
[81] Dostoevsky F. Decree. Op. C. 269.
[82] Khrenov N., Sokolov K. The artistic life of Imperial Russia (subcultures, worldviews, mentality). St. Petersburg: Aleteya, 2001. p. 585.
[83] Dostoevsky F. Decree. Op. C. 221.
[84] Ibid., p. 345.
[85] Ibid. p. 441.
[86] Blok A. Collected works: in 8 vol. t. 5. M.-L.: State Publishing House of Fiction, 1962. p. 345.
[87] Ibid. p. 348.
[88] Dostoevsky F. Decree. Op. C. 45.
[89] The dispute about Bakunin and Dostoevsky. Articles by L. Grossman and Vyach. Polonsky. L.: State Publishing House, 1926. p. 9.
[90] Ibid.
[91] Dostoevsky F. Decree. Op. C. 45.
[92] Camus A. Decree. Op. C. 239
[93] Ibid., p. 241.
[94] Ibid., p. 85.
[95] Dostoevsky F. Decree. Op. C. 43.
[96] Panchenko A. The Silver Age and the death of Russia // Lectures and reports of members of the Russian Academy of Sciences at SPbGUP (1993-2013): in 3 vols. 3. St. Petersburg, 2013. p. 527.
[97] Bulgakov S. Two hail. Research on the nature of social ideals. St. Petersburg: Publishing House of the Russian Christian Humanitarian Institute, 1997. p. 259.
[98] Soloviev V. Literary Criticism. Moscow: Sovremennik, 1990. p. 277.
[99] Ibid. p. 286.
[100] Camus A. Decree. op. p. 133.
[101] Ibid., p. 156.
[102] Merezhkovsky D. L. Tolstoy and Dostoevsky. Decree. op. p. 275.
[103] Bulgakov S. Russian tragedy. Decree. op. p. 504.
[104] Lotman Yu. Selected articles: in 3 vols. 3. Tallinn: "Alexandra", 1993. p. 96.
[105] Ibid. p. 101.
[106] Merezhkovsky D. L. Tolstoy and Dostoevsky. Decree. op. p. 275.
[107] Dostoevsky F. Decree. Op. C. 269.

 

 

ISSN 2311-3723

Founder:
OOO «Soglasie» publisher

Publisher:
Scientific Association of Culture Researchers

Official registration № ЭЛ № ФС 77 – 56414 от 11.12.2013

The magazine is indexed:

Issued quarterly in electronic form only

 

Issue produced by:

Editorial Director
A. Flier

Editor in Chief
T. Glazkova

Head of IT Center
A. Lukyanov

 

Our banner:

Our e-mail:
cultschool@gmail.com

 

 
 

OUR PARTNERS:

РУС ENG