SCIENTIFIC AND EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY FOR CULTURAL STUDIES
SCIENTIFIC ASSOCIATION OF CULTURE RESEARCHERS

Culture of culture

Scientific peer-reviewed electronic periodical
Since 2014

РУС ENG

Hypotheses:

THEORETICAL REVIEW

E.A. Orlova. Concepts of identity/identification in socio-scientific knowledge

 

Discussions:

IN SEARCH OF THE MEANING OF HISTORY AND CULTURE (A.Ya. Flier's rubric)

A.Ya. Flier. Culture as the basis of identity

N.A. Khrenov. The Russian Revolution from the point of view of the transitional situation in the history of culture. Rehabilitation of the Imperial complex as a consequence of the period of reaction in the history of the Revolution (continued)

V.M. Rozin. From the views of L.S. Vygotsky to the modern concept of development

 

Analytics:

CULTURAL REFLECTIONS

A.Ya. Flier. Accumulation and transmission of social experience. Socio-cultural reproduction

N.A. Khrenov. Culture and Technology: from the organ projection of E. Kappa to the objectification of Hegel's spirit (Semiotic turn in the culture of the twentieth century) (continued)

V.M. Rozin. Personality formation: the role of the social environment and the work of the individual's consciousness

 

VIEWS

A.Ya. Flier. Culture as a survival system and its 5 strategies

A.P. Markov. Traditional Values – "New Ethics": the Global Conflict of Logos and Chaos


Announcement of the next issue

 

 

Grachev Vladimir Innokentievich,
Doctor of Cultural Studies, Professor
Leningrad state
University of. A.S. Pushkin
e-mail: vig1947@mail.ru

The Great Russian ReVolution or «Great Upheaval»)?!
(the values and traditions of culture in post –reVolution chronotope)

Abstract. The article describes the ratio of key concepts and word-formation associated with reVolutionary and post-reVolutionary events took place in Russia 1917 year, radically altered the social and cultural condition of Russian society. It is the basis of cultural values and traditions in the national ethnic groups and cultures. Their associates into a whole system of synergetic socio-cultural communication that defines the structure, similarity, difference, opposition interdependence, ambivalence and to them in the post-reVolution "socio-cultura chronotope ".

Keywords. Culture, reVolution, eVolution, value, tradition, communication, society, socio-cultural space, system, synergy, paradigm, chronotope.
 

[1] Gorky M. Untimely thoughts: Notes on revolution and culture. M.: Soviet pisatel’, 1990. P. 92.
[2] Ibid. P.92.
[3] Ibid.
[4] Values and communication in modern society. SPb.: GPU, 2012. 220 p.
[5] Leont'ev K. N. Byzantism and Slavdom. M.: 1967. 346 p.
[6] Karsavin L. p. East, West and Russian tradition. SPb.: ACADEMIA, 1922. P. 12.
[7] Grachev V. I. Communication – Values – Culture (experience of information and axiological analysis: Monograph. SPb.:.Asterion, 2006. 248 p.
[8] Kuhn T. S. the Structure of scientific revolutions. M.: Progress, 1977.  300 p.
[9] The Paradigm approach is increasingly spread in cultural and other studies. Suffice it to mention only some names of the most well-known foreign and domestic scholars who conducted and conducting their: T. Kuhn, C., pierce, R. Jacobson, E. Seppir, J. Andries, F. de Saussure, C. Levi-Strauss, M. Foucault, J. Liotard. R. Barthes, U. Eco; Y. M. Lotman, M. P. Kagan, E. V. Sokolov, V. P. Stepin, G. L. Tulchinsky, A. Y. Flier, A. P. Kalmykov. P. V. Klyagin, A. P. Markov, G. M., Birjiniuk, V. I. Grachev, M. V. Maasai, A. V. Kostina, D. O. Shipunova, N.. Fucking.
[10] Vekhi; Intelligentsia in Russia: Sat. article 1909-1910 y. M.: Molodaya Gvardiya, 1991. 462 p.
[11] Lunacharsky A.V. the great revolution (October revolution). Part 1. Ed. Z. I. Grzhebin's publishing house. Pg., 1919. 99 p.
[12] Lavrov V. M. Orthodox view of the Lenin experiment on Russia. M.: Father's house, 2018. 96 p.
[13] Ortega y Gasset H. "Dehumanization of art" and other works. Essay on literature and art. M.: Rainbow, 1991. 639 p.
[14] About this diversity of scientists ' positions in the evaluation of the modern socio-cultural paradigm see: Grachev V. I. Communicative-axiogenic paradigm of culture ecology // Culture. 2018.  No. 3. Primas'. 6.
[15] Grachev V. I. Modern art culture: paradigm or discourse?! (comparative axiological analysis). Monograph. SPb.: Asterion. 2016. 274 p.
[16] Borealist realism: a modern look and a Modern look. M.: Olympus, 2008. P. 459.

 

 

ISSN 2311-3723

Founder:
OOO «Soglasie» publisher

Publisher:
Scientific Association of Culture Researchers

Official registration № ЭЛ № ФС 77 – 56414 от 11.12.2013

The magazine is indexed:

Issued quarterly in electronic form only

 

Issue produced by:

Editorial Director
A. Flier

Editor in Chief
T. Glazkova

Head of IT Center
A. Lukyanov

 

Our banner:

Our e-mail:
cultschool@gmail.com

 

 
 

OUR PARTNERS:

РУС ENG